Design of Forward Osmosis Desalination Configurations: Exergy and Energy Perspectives

This study presents a detailed energy and exergy analysis of two forward osmosis (FO) desalination systems: single-pass and regenerative configurations. Both utilize osmotic pressure from a concentrated draw solution to drive water transport through a semi-permeable membrane. The regenerative system includes extra components for draw solute recovery, which increases electrical energy consumption to 188.9 kW and slightly lowers water recovery to 54%, compared to 98 kW and 60% for the single-pass FO system. Equivalent work for desalination is 1.4 kWh/m3 for single-pass and 1.8 kWh/m3 for regenerative FO systems. Exergy analysis shows the distillation column as the largest contributor to exergy destruction in both systems, responsible for over 44% of losses. The regenerative system adds 57.9 MW of chemical exergy destruction in the regenerator. Physical exergy destruction mainly occurs in the reboiler and condenser, while chemical exergy destruction is dominant in the FO membrane unit and regenerator. These findings provide valuable insights for improving the efficiency and sustainability of FO desalination technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15169168
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Membrane Separation Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design of Forward Osmosis Desalination Configurations: Exergy and Energy Perspectives

Youngjin Kim, Chul-Woo Park, Dae-Joong Kim
1 citations
Applied Sciences
Membrane Separation Technologies
0.82
article

Design of Forward Osmosis Desalination Configurations: Exergy and Energy Perspectives

Youngjin Kim, Chul-Woo Park, Dae-Joong Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study presents a detailed energy and exergy analysis of two forward osmosis (FO) desalination systems: single-pass and regenerative configurations. Both utilize osmotic pressure from a concentrated draw solution to drive water transport through a semi-permeable membrane. The regenerative system includes extra components for draw solute recovery, which increases electrical energy consumption to 188.9 kW and slightly lowers water recovery to 54%, compared to 98 kW and 60% for the single-pass FO system. Equivalent work for desalination is 1.4 kWh/m3 for single-pass and 1.8 kWh/m3 for regenerative FO systems. Exergy analysis shows the distillation column as the largest contributor to exergy destruction in both systems, responsible for over 44% of losses. The regenerative system adds 57.9 MW of chemical exergy destruction in the regenerator. Physical exergy destruction mainly occurs in the reboiler and condenser, while chemical exergy destruction is dominant in the FO membrane unit and regenerator. These findings provide valuable insights for improving the efficiency and sustainability of FO desalination technologies.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(16)
Sogang University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Membrane Separation Technologies
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.