Models for Classifying Cognitive Load Using Physiological Data in Healthcare Context: A Scoping Review

Background: In healthcare education, understanding and managing cognitive load is crucial for enhancing learning outcomes for students, healthcare professionals, patients, and the general public. Despite numerous studies developing cognitive load classification models, there is a lack of comprehensive guidelines on how to effectively utilize these models in healthcare education. This study reviews cognitive load classification models using physiological data to provide insights and guidelines for their development in healthcare contexts. Methods: A scoping review was conducted on studies published between 2015 and 2024, identified through databases including Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. The search terms included “cognitive load,” “physiology,” “data,” and “classification.” Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed journal articles in English, focused on the healthcare context, utilizing experimental physiological data, and developing classification models. After screening 351 articles, ten studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in detail. Results: Task design predominantly focused on measuring intrinsic cognitive load by adjusting task difficulty. Data collection mainly utilized EEG (electroencephalogram) and body movement data. SVM (support vector machine) algorithms were the most frequently used for model development, with cross-validation and feature selection employed to prevent overfitting. This study derived the importance of clearly defining cognitive load types, designing appropriate tasks, establishing reliable ground truths with multiple indicators, and selecting contextually relevant data. Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive analysis of cognitive load classification models using physiological data in healthcare education, offering valuable guidelines for their development. Despite the study’s limitations, including a small number of analyzed papers and limited diversity in educational contexts, it offers critical insights for using and developing cognitive load classification in healthcare education. Future research should explore the applicability of these models across diverse educational settings and populations, aiming to enhance the effectiveness of healthcare education and ultimately improve learning and healthcare outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15169155
Primary Topic
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Models for Classifying Cognitive Load Using Physiological Data in Healthcare Context: A Scoping Review

Yejin Han, Min-Ji Kim, Hyeongjo Kim
Applied Sciences
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
article

Models for Classifying Cognitive Load Using Physiological Data in Healthcare Context: A Scoping Review

Yejin Han, Min-Ji Kim, Hyeongjo Kim
article en

Abstract

Background: In healthcare education, understanding and managing cognitive load is crucial for enhancing learning outcomes for students, healthcare professionals, patients, and the general public. Despite numerous studies developing cognitive load classification models, there is a lack of comprehensive guidelines on how to effectively utilize these models in healthcare education. This study reviews cognitive load classification models using physiological data to provide insights and guidelines for their development in healthcare contexts. Methods: A scoping review was conducted on studies published between 2015 and 2024, identified through databases including Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. The search terms included “cognitive load,” “physiology,” “data,” and “classification.” Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed journal articles in English, focused on the healthcare context, utilizing experimental physiological data, and developing classification models. After screening 351 articles, ten studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in detail. Results: Task design predominantly focused on measuring intrinsic cognitive load by adjusting task difficulty. Data collection mainly utilized EEG (electroencephalogram) and body movement data. SVM (support vector machine) algorithms were the most frequently used for model development, with cross-validation and feature selection employed to prevent overfitting. This study derived the importance of clearly defining cognitive load types, designing appropriate tasks, establishing reliable ground truths with multiple indicators, and selecting contextually relevant data. Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive analysis of cognitive load classification models using physiological data in healthcare education, offering valuable guidelines for their development. Despite the study’s limitations, including a small number of analyzed papers and limited diversity in educational contexts, it offers critical insights for using and developing cognitive load classification in healthcare education. Future research should explore the applicability of these models across diverse educational settings and populations, aiming to enhance the effectiveness of healthcare education and ultimately improve learning and healthcare outcomes.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(16)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Seoul National University of Education (KR), Yeungnam University Medical Center (KR)
Yeungnam University
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.