The Global Balance Of Power: Strategic Coordination And Diverging Interests Between The United States And China

The purpose of this study is to analyze the pattern of coordination and differences of interest between the US and China, using a qualitative approach through a literature study. The methods used include content analysis of reputable academic sources such as Scopus-indexed international journals, policy reports from think tanks, as well as secondary data from international organizations. The study builds on five main literature frameworks: realism, strategic coordination, regional conflicts, technological competition, and multilateral diplomacy. The results of the analysis show that although there are several areas of cooperation between the two countries, ideological differences and geopolitical goals remain the main obstacles. This study makes a theoretical and practical contribution to the development of the study of international relations, especially in formulating diplomatic strategies that are adaptive to the dynamics of global multipolarism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Cendekia Hukum Indonesia
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71417/jchi.v1i2.22
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Global Balance Of Power: Strategic Coordination And Diverging Interests Between The United States And China

Gusti Luthfi Fahrezi
Jurnal Cendekia Hukum Indonesia
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

The Global Balance Of Power: Strategic Coordination And Diverging Interests Between The United States And China

Gusti Luthfi Fahrezi
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the pattern of coordination and differences of interest between the US and China, using a qualitative approach through a literature study. The methods used include content analysis of reputable academic sources such as Scopus-indexed international journals, policy reports from think tanks, as well as secondary data from international organizations. The study builds on five main literature frameworks: realism, strategic coordination, regional conflicts, technological competition, and multilateral diplomacy. The results of the analysis show that although there are several areas of cooperation between the two countries, ideological differences and geopolitical goals remain the main obstacles. This study makes a theoretical and practical contribution to the development of the study of international relations, especially in formulating diplomatic strategies that are adaptive to the dynamics of global multipolarism.

Jurnal Cendekia Hukum IndonesiaVol. 1(2)
Islamic University of Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.