Whose behaviour? Why poverty research should focus on inequality

Many in the United Kingdom are experiencing poverty because of extreme inequality of wealth. However, the dominant political explanation is that poverty is at least partially due to the behaviour and personal deficits of the poorest. Although a feature of neo-liberalism, holding people responsible for their own poverty has a long history as it serves the interests of the wealthiest. Equally longstanding are arguments that refute this individualistic perspective and instead show how poverty is structural, but these are less frequent and visible. Using existing literature, this article provides an analysis of these counterarguments to show common stereotypes of people experiencing poverty are inaccurate and discriminatory. This demonstrates that poverty research is problematic if it suggests, to any extent, that disadvantaged individuals are to blame and therefore it should be viewed as prejudiced. Instead, research should focus on the behaviour, choices and personal deficits of the most privileged such as the greed and selfishness that feeds into economic and social policy. Until it is recognized by academics, policy-makers and the wider public that no person experiencing poverty is to blame, poverty will not be eradicated because policy will continue to be based on the idea that some deserve their underprivileged position.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Class & Culture
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1386/jclc_00053_1
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whose behaviour? Why poverty research should focus on inequality

Ruth Woolsey
Journal of Class & Culture
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
article

Whose behaviour? Why poverty research should focus on inequality

Ruth Woolsey
article en

Abstract

Many in the United Kingdom are experiencing poverty because of extreme inequality of wealth. However, the dominant political explanation is that poverty is at least partially due to the behaviour and personal deficits of the poorest. Although a feature of neo-liberalism, holding people responsible for their own poverty has a long history as it serves the interests of the wealthiest. Equally longstanding are arguments that refute this individualistic perspective and instead show how poverty is structural, but these are less frequent and visible. Using existing literature, this article provides an analysis of these counterarguments to show common stereotypes of people experiencing poverty are inaccurate and discriminatory. This demonstrates that poverty research is problematic if it suggests, to any extent, that disadvantaged individuals are to blame and therefore it should be viewed as prejudiced. Instead, research should focus on the behaviour, choices and personal deficits of the most privileged such as the greed and selfishness that feeds into economic and social policy. Until it is recognized by academics, policy-makers and the wider public that no person experiencing poverty is to blame, poverty will not be eradicated because policy will continue to be based on the idea that some deserve their underprivileged position.

Journal of Class & CultureVol. 4(1)
Leeds Beckett University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Whose behaviour? Why poverty research should focus on inequality — Ruth Woolsey · Journal of Class & Culture (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS