Demystifying the Use of Compression in Virtual Production

Virtual Production (VP) technologies enhance on-set filming and live concerts through high-resolution, high-brightness LED panels. Due to technical challenges like synchronization and color balancing, the industry prefers resource-intensive lossless compression for displays. Modern lossy standards (AV1, H.265) could maintain quality while reducing resource demands, yet no agreed methodology exists for assessing their in-camera impact. We present a method comparing lossless and lossy compressed footage displayed through VP screens and recorded in-camera. Our assessment compares HAP/NotchLC/Daniel2 intermediate codecs with hardware Nvidia Encoders (NVENC) using AV1/HEVC/H.264 compression at bitrates from 2–2000 Mbit/s with various GOP sizes using different perceptual quality metrics. Results demonstrate hybrid codecs achieve equivalent quality to intermediate encoders at significantly lower bitrates and storage requirements.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5594/jmi.2025/mjpy7062
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Demystifying the Use of Compression in Virtual Production

Vibhoothi Vibhoothi, François Pitié, Cody Z. Nash, Anil Kokaram et al.
1 citations
SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
1.24
article

Demystifying the Use of Compression in Virtual Production

Vibhoothi Vibhoothi, François Pitié, Cody Z. Nash, Anil Kokaram, Julien Zouein, James W. Bentley, Philip Coulam-Jones
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Virtual Production (VP) technologies enhance on-set filming and live concerts through high-resolution, high-brightness LED panels. Due to technical challenges like synchronization and color balancing, the industry prefers resource-intensive lossless compression for displays. Modern lossy standards (AV1, H.265) could maintain quality while reducing resource demands, yet no agreed methodology exists for assessing their in-camera impact. We present a method comparing lossless and lossy compressed footage displayed through VP screens and recorded in-camera. Our assessment compares HAP/NotchLC/Daniel2 intermediate codecs with hardware Nvidia Encoders (NVENC) using AV1/HEVC/H.264 compression at bitrates from 2–2000 Mbit/s with various GOP sizes using different perceptual quality metrics. Results demonstrate hybrid codecs achieve equivalent quality to intermediate encoders at significantly lower bitrates and storage requirements.

SMPTE Motion Imaging JournalVol. 134(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
1.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.