Examining Deep Learning Models for Reliable Detection of Copy-Move Forgeries in Digital Images

The proliferation of digital image processing has led to an increase in copy-move forgery (CMF), necessitating effective detection techniques to ensure image authenticity. This study evaluates the performance of three deep learning architectures: Convolutional Neural Network (CNNs), Autoencoders, and Convolutional Neural Network - Long ShortTerm Memory (CNN-LSTM), using the Copy-Move Forgery Detection (CoMoFoD) dataset to identify CMF. The assessment parameters encompass accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and the duration required for computation. Among the various models discussed, the CNN-LSTM model achieved the highest performance, demonstrating an accuracy of 94.8%, precision of 92.4%, recall of 93.9%, and an F1 score of 93.1%. In comparison, the CNN and Autoencoder models achieved accuracy of 91.2% and 88.5%, respectively. Additionally, the CNN-LSTM model showed promising outcomes for identification following the implementation of the most common distortions; the identification accuracies reached 90.1% for rotation, 92.5% for scaling, and 88.7% for Gaussian blurring. The findings suggest that employing more intricate deep learning models, explicitly utilizing a single stream of convolutional neural networks, could enhance the accuracy of forgery detection. This lays the groundwork for practical applications in digital image authentication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23919/indiacom66777.2025.11115367
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Media Forensic Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining Deep Learning Models for Reliable Detection of Copy-Move Forgeries in Digital Images

Anuj Kumar, Naseeb Dar, Rani Atsya
1 citations
Digital Media Forensic Detection
1.28
article

Examining Deep Learning Models for Reliable Detection of Copy-Move Forgeries in Digital Images

Anuj Kumar, Naseeb Dar, Rani Atsya
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The proliferation of digital image processing has led to an increase in copy-move forgery (CMF), necessitating effective detection techniques to ensure image authenticity. This study evaluates the performance of three deep learning architectures: Convolutional Neural Network (CNNs), Autoencoders, and Convolutional Neural Network - Long ShortTerm Memory (CNN-LSTM), using the Copy-Move Forgery Detection (CoMoFoD) dataset to identify CMF. The assessment parameters encompass accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and the duration required for computation. Among the various models discussed, the CNN-LSTM model achieved the highest performance, demonstrating an accuracy of 94.8%, precision of 92.4%, recall of 93.9%, and an F1 score of 93.1%. In comparison, the CNN and Autoencoder models achieved accuracy of 91.2% and 88.5%, respectively. Additionally, the CNN-LSTM model showed promising outcomes for identification following the implementation of the most common distortions; the identification accuracies reached 90.1% for rotation, 92.5% for scaling, and 88.7% for Gaussian blurring. The findings suggest that employing more intricate deep learning models, explicitly utilizing a single stream of convolutional neural networks, could enhance the accuracy of forgery detection. This lays the groundwork for practical applications in digital image authentication.

Noida International University (IN), Sharda University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Digital Media Forensic Detection
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.