(Un)Dependable Artificial Intelligence: Digital Practice and Ethical Worldview Evaluation

The paper is devoted to the research and evaluation of ethical regularities of Artificial Intelligence as a certain digital existence in the context of worldview parameters. A critical review of the main provisions and principles surrounding the issue is given, finding and developing the progressive criteria in them and establishing a unique theoretical-worldview concept corresponding to modern requirements. The relationships fixed between the thinking of the fields of humanitarian and exact knowledge around the issue are shown in an original way; a kind of attempt is presented to understand and evaluate the system-conceptual model developed on the basis of moral criteria in the digital world of organized management in a new way. The discursive resource of the axiological approach and the potential of constructing reflexive conclusions with the dialectical method are utilized and used. It is indicated what probable moral consequences can result from the solution of the intellectual dilemma established in modern digital practice, more specifically, the alternative task of the protocol and software of the creative-argumentative algorithm associated with it. In particular, the latter can only be considered in the format of an admissible possibility or present it in the form of an implemented cybernetic reality. The expected difficulties of interaction between natural and artificial intelligences and appropriate control mechanism paradigms are described and analyzed, namely, the concepts of the ethical value of the artifact are demonstrated - within the framework of essential and principled reliability/unreliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/dessert65323.2024.11122197
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(Un)Dependable Artificial Intelligence: Digital Practice and Ethical Worldview Evaluation

Ibraim Didmanidze, Irma Bagrationi, Volodymyr Zaslavskyi, Olga Yamkova
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

(Un)Dependable Artificial Intelligence: Digital Practice and Ethical Worldview Evaluation

Ibraim Didmanidze, Irma Bagrationi, Volodymyr Zaslavskyi, Olga Yamkova
article en

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the research and evaluation of ethical regularities of Artificial Intelligence as a certain digital existence in the context of worldview parameters. A critical review of the main provisions and principles surrounding the issue is given, finding and developing the progressive criteria in them and establishing a unique theoretical-worldview concept corresponding to modern requirements. The relationships fixed between the thinking of the fields of humanitarian and exact knowledge around the issue are shown in an original way; a kind of attempt is presented to understand and evaluate the system-conceptual model developed on the basis of moral criteria in the digital world of organized management in a new way. The discursive resource of the axiological approach and the potential of constructing reflexive conclusions with the dialectical method are utilized and used. It is indicated what probable moral consequences can result from the solution of the intellectual dilemma established in modern digital practice, more specifically, the alternative task of the protocol and software of the creative-argumentative algorithm associated with it. In particular, the latter can only be considered in the format of an admissible possibility or present it in the form of an implemented cybernetic reality. The expected difficulties of interaction between natural and artificial intelligences and appropriate control mechanism paradigms are described and analyzed, namely, the concepts of the ethical value of the artifact are demonstrated - within the framework of essential and principled reliability/unreliability.

Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University (GE), Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.