Kesalahan Penggunaan Verba Dinatory BahasaJepang pada Mahasiswa Pemelajar Bahasa Jepang

The standard structure of Giver ga Receiver ni camera wo yaru/kureru' follows the view of Love regarding Japanese Donatory Verbs.. The structure keeps some rules that Japanese learners rarely observe. One of the aspects that is rarely seen is the social status of the subject filler Giver, the recipient of Receiver (dative) and Speaker (speaker). These three components have a great influence on the filler of the predicate, yaru or kureru. If the social status of S is inferior to G, while the social relationship between S and R meets the criteria of uchi in blood or insider relationships, then the embedded verb is kureru. This consideration is the background of this research. Meanwhile, the purpose of this article is to illustrate the form of error in the use of Donatory Verbs sentences. The data collection method was carried out through questionnaires. The questionnaire details are compiled based on cases of incorrect in Indonesian to youngen the analysis of the sentence of acceptance in Japanese. The results of the analysis found that there are quite massive difficulties in the use of verbs that are in harmony with the social relations of G, R, S, as well as the placement of the role of G, R, S and the social status they hold. The analysis of the questionnaire also touched on the interference of the mother tongue structure into Japanese, the difficulty of considering the gradation of the keigo speech act (敬語) according to the view of Love on the rules of Donatory Verbs. A small percentage of respondents used a sentence translation unit with a selection of words or categories that did not match

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal SAKURA Sastra Bahasa Kebudayaan dan Pranata Jepang
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24843/js.2025.v07.i02.p08
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Methods and Media Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kesalahan Penggunaan Verba Dinatory BahasaJepang pada Mahasiswa Pemelajar Bahasa Jepang

Dance Wamafma
1 citations
Jurnal SAKURA Sastra Bahasa Kebudayaan dan Pranata Jepang
Educational Methods and Media Use
3.25
article

Kesalahan Penggunaan Verba Dinatory BahasaJepang pada Mahasiswa Pemelajar Bahasa Jepang

Dance Wamafma
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The standard structure of Giver ga Receiver ni camera wo yaru/kureru' follows the view of Love regarding Japanese Donatory Verbs.. The structure keeps some rules that Japanese learners rarely observe. One of the aspects that is rarely seen is the social status of the subject filler Giver, the recipient of Receiver (dative) and Speaker (speaker). These three components have a great influence on the filler of the predicate, yaru or kureru. If the social status of S is inferior to G, while the social relationship between S and R meets the criteria of uchi in blood or insider relationships, then the embedded verb is kureru. This consideration is the background of this research. Meanwhile, the purpose of this article is to illustrate the form of error in the use of Donatory Verbs sentences. The data collection method was carried out through questionnaires. The questionnaire details are compiled based on cases of incorrect in Indonesian to youngen the analysis of the sentence of acceptance in Japanese. The results of the analysis found that there are quite massive difficulties in the use of verbs that are in harmony with the social relations of G, R, S, as well as the placement of the role of G, R, S and the social status they hold. The analysis of the questionnaire also touched on the interference of the mother tongue structure into Japanese, the difficulty of considering the gradation of the keigo speech act (敬語) according to the view of Love on the rules of Donatory Verbs. A small percentage of respondents used a sentence translation unit with a selection of words or categories that did not match

Jurnal SAKURA Sastra Bahasa Kebudayaan dan Pranata JepangVol. 7(2)
Maranatha Christian University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Educational Methods and Media Use
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.