Faculty Perceptions of AI Challenges at the University of Petra

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly present in higher education, offering new opportunities and also raising important concerns. To better understand how faculty members perceive the challenges of AI, this study surveyed instructors at the University of Petra (UOP). Participants responded to six statements, each highlighting a potential drawback of AI in education, specifically addressing issues of privacy, bias, misinformation, regulation, equity of access, and disciplinary relevance. A total of 105 instructors from the Faculty of Information Technology (FIT) and the Faculty of Arts and Sciences (FAS) took part in the survey. Respondents represented a wide range of academic ranks (52 Assistant Professors, 22 Lecturers, 21 Associate Professors and 10 Full Professors) and teaching experience levels (about one-third with more than 16 years, one-third with 5-15 years, and the rest with fewer than 5 years), including 65 males and 40 females. This diverse group offers insight into how faculty from different backgrounds view the potential risks of AI in the classroom. In this paper, we analyse the responses to each statement, explore how faculty characteristics may influence their views, compare the findings with existing literature, and offer recommendations for institutional leaders seeking to implement AI in thoughtful and inclusive ways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information & Knowledge Management
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219649225500662
Primary Topic
Organizational and Employee Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Faculty Perceptions of AI Challenges at the University of Petra

Faisal Aburub, Wael Hadi, Mayyas Al‐Remawi, Rami A. Abdel‐Rahem
Journal of Information & Knowledge Management
Organizational and Employee Performance
article

Faculty Perceptions of AI Challenges at the University of Petra

Faisal Aburub, Wael Hadi, Mayyas Al‐Remawi, Rami A. Abdel‐Rahem
article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly present in higher education, offering new opportunities and also raising important concerns. To better understand how faculty members perceive the challenges of AI, this study surveyed instructors at the University of Petra (UOP). Participants responded to six statements, each highlighting a potential drawback of AI in education, specifically addressing issues of privacy, bias, misinformation, regulation, equity of access, and disciplinary relevance. A total of 105 instructors from the Faculty of Information Technology (FIT) and the Faculty of Arts and Sciences (FAS) took part in the survey. Respondents represented a wide range of academic ranks (52 Assistant Professors, 22 Lecturers, 21 Associate Professors and 10 Full Professors) and teaching experience levels (about one-third with more than 16 years, one-third with 5-15 years, and the rest with fewer than 5 years), including 65 males and 40 females. This diverse group offers insight into how faculty from different backgrounds view the potential risks of AI in the classroom. In this paper, we analyse the responses to each statement, explore how faculty characteristics may influence their views, compare the findings with existing literature, and offer recommendations for institutional leaders seeking to implement AI in thoughtful and inclusive ways.

Journal of Information & Knowledge ManagementVol. 25(01)
Petra University (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Organizational and Employee Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.