Real-time Galileo/GPS PPP timing for LEO satellite via Galileo HAS

Abstract Ensuring high-precision time synchronization among low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites, as well as between LEO and global navigation satellite system (GNSS) satellites, is essential for enabling high-precision applications. As an integrated precise point positioning (PPP) augmentation service within the Galileo satellite navigation system, Galileo High Accuracy Service (HAS) offers free satellite ephemeris corrections for GPS and Galileo satellites to global users, effectively supporting real-time space-based autonomous GNSS PPP timing and time transfer for LEO satellites. To explore the performance of HAS in LEO satellite timing and time transfer, this study conducts an in-depth analysis of GRACE-FO and Sentinel-6A for experiments. The results indicated that during the study period, the short-term stability (1280 s) of GPS PPP timing for the GRACE-FO using HAS products was 3.64–5.55 × 10 −13 , whereas the long-term stability (10240 s) was 3.19–5.93 × 10 −14 . The short-term stability values of GPS, Galileo, and GPS-Galileo PPP timing for Sentinel-6 A using HAS products were 1.75–2.72 × 10 −12 , 6.97 × 10 −13 –1.04 × 10 −12 , and 6.79–8.46 × 10 −13 , respectively. The long-term stability values were 3.50–5.05 × 10 −13 , 3.75–5.04 × 10 −13 , and 3.44–4.65 × 10 −13 , respectively. Compared to reliable analysis centers, HAS showed comparable performance in Galileo and Galileo/GPS PPP timing; however, the short-term stability of GPS PPP timing was lower due to the inferior quality of its GPS products. Regarding the time transfer, HAS exhibited a short-term stability of 4.04–5.09 × 10 −13 (between GRACE-FO) and 1.94–2.30 × 10 −12 (between GRACE-FO C and Sentinel-6A), a long-term stability of 3.69–5.14 × 10 −14 (between GRACE-FO) and 3.81–5.29 × 10 −13 (between GRACE-FO C and Sentinel-6A) in GPS, which is inferior to currently reliable analysis centers. Compared to the International GNSS Service final product, HAS exhibited an average standard deviation of 0.49 ns and 2.59 ns for GPS PPP time transfer between GRACE-FO satellites and between GRACE-FO C and Sentinel-6A, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement Science and Technology
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/adfb9a
Primary Topic
GNSS positioning and interference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-time Galileo/GPS PPP timing for LEO satellite via Galileo HAS

Peiyuan Zhou, Qiang Shu, Fei Shen, Daqian Lyu et al.
Measurement Science and Technology
GNSS positioning and interference
article

Real-time Galileo/GPS PPP timing for LEO satellite via Galileo HAS

Peiyuan Zhou, Qiang Shu, Fei Shen, Daqian Lyu, guanqi liu, Guoqiang Jiao, Fei Ye, Qianqian Chen, Xinyun Cao, Xin Chen, Yunyu Ge
article en

Abstract

Abstract Ensuring high-precision time synchronization among low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites, as well as between LEO and global navigation satellite system (GNSS) satellites, is essential for enabling high-precision applications. As an integrated precise point positioning (PPP) augmentation service within the Galileo satellite navigation system, Galileo High Accuracy Service (HAS) offers free satellite ephemeris corrections for GPS and Galileo satellites to global users, effectively supporting real-time space-based autonomous GNSS PPP timing and time transfer for LEO satellites. To explore the performance of HAS in LEO satellite timing and time transfer, this study conducts an in-depth analysis of GRACE-FO and Sentinel-6A for experiments. The results indicated that during the study period, the short-term stability (1280 s) of GPS PPP timing for the GRACE-FO using HAS products was 3.64–5.55 × 10 −13 , whereas the long-term stability (10240 s) was 3.19–5.93 × 10 −14 . The short-term stability values of GPS, Galileo, and GPS-Galileo PPP timing for Sentinel-6 A using HAS products were 1.75–2.72 × 10 −12 , 6.97 × 10 −13 –1.04 × 10 −12 , and 6.79–8.46 × 10 −13 , respectively. The long-term stability values were 3.50–5.05 × 10 −13 , 3.75–5.04 × 10 −13 , and 3.44–4.65 × 10 −13 , respectively. Compared to reliable analysis centers, HAS showed comparable performance in Galileo and Galileo/GPS PPP timing; however, the short-term stability of GPS PPP timing was lower due to the inferior quality of its GPS products. Regarding the time transfer, HAS exhibited a short-term stability of 4.04–5.09 × 10 −13 (between GRACE-FO) and 1.94–2.30 × 10 −12 (between GRACE-FO C and Sentinel-6A), a long-term stability of 3.69–5.14 × 10 −14 (between GRACE-FO) and 3.81–5.29 × 10 −13 (between GRACE-FO C and Sentinel-6A) in GPS, which is inferior to currently reliable analysis centers. Compared to the International GNSS Service final product, HAS exhibited an average standard deviation of 0.49 ns and 2.59 ns for GPS PPP time transfer between GRACE-FO satellites and between GRACE-FO C and Sentinel-6A, respectively.

Measurement Science and TechnologyVol. 36(8)
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN), Nanjing Normal University (CN), National University of Defense Technology (CN), Changsha University (CN), Beijing Electronic Science and Technology Institute (CN), EOX IT Services (Austria) (AT), Nanjing Product Quality Supervision and Inspection Institute (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Government of Jiangsu Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
GNSS positioning and interference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.