Integrating societal, stakeholder, and ecological priorities in riparian woodland restoration: making opportunity maps functional

Abstract Introduction Large‐scale modeling of opportunities for woodland creation in a U.K. context is responding to government pledges to increase woodland cover from 14.5 to 17.5% by 2050. Such mapping focuses on harnessing ecosystem services but fails to predict outcomes for ecological restoration. There is a need to address trade‐offs between biodiversity conservation and nature‐based solutions, as highlighted in recent reports by the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Objectives This paper explores the limitations of current approaches to modeling woodland restoration opportunities and the possibility of leveraging spatial‐ecological and spatially explicit deliberative methods to increase the functionality of opportunity mapping. Methods Proposed riparian woodland creation sites in Grasmere (United Kingdom) were identified through the delineation of a variable width riparian zone and the application of land use constraints employed in other large‐scale woodland opportunity mapping in the United Kingdom. Riparian woodland creation was simulated, emphasizing alternately environmental goals (water quality management and bank stability), ecological function (habitat quality), and stakeholder preference. Results This approach integrates environmental, ecological, and stakeholder priorities into a spatially explicit evaluation of habitat restoration opportunities. It is able to anticipate the interaction between these different dimensions, potential trade‐offs, and subsequent impacts on ecological processes of interest. Conclusions This paper articulates the shortcomings of available approaches to modeling opportunities for habitat creation, identifies objectives for the development of more integrated methods, and demonstrates how promising recent developments and avenues of inquiry can help to meet these objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70177
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating societal, stakeholder, and ecological priorities in riparian woodland restoration: making opportunity maps functional

Matthew Dennis
Restoration Ecology
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Integrating societal, stakeholder, and ecological priorities in riparian woodland restoration: making opportunity maps functional

Matthew Dennis
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Large‐scale modeling of opportunities for woodland creation in a U.K. context is responding to government pledges to increase woodland cover from 14.5 to 17.5% by 2050. Such mapping focuses on harnessing ecosystem services but fails to predict outcomes for ecological restoration. There is a need to address trade‐offs between biodiversity conservation and nature‐based solutions, as highlighted in recent reports by the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Objectives This paper explores the limitations of current approaches to modeling woodland restoration opportunities and the possibility of leveraging spatial‐ecological and spatially explicit deliberative methods to increase the functionality of opportunity mapping. Methods Proposed riparian woodland creation sites in Grasmere (United Kingdom) were identified through the delineation of a variable width riparian zone and the application of land use constraints employed in other large‐scale woodland opportunity mapping in the United Kingdom. Riparian woodland creation was simulated, emphasizing alternately environmental goals (water quality management and bank stability), ecological function (habitat quality), and stakeholder preference. Results This approach integrates environmental, ecological, and stakeholder priorities into a spatially explicit evaluation of habitat restoration opportunities. It is able to anticipate the interaction between these different dimensions, potential trade‐offs, and subsequent impacts on ecological processes of interest. Conclusions This paper articulates the shortcomings of available approaches to modeling opportunities for habitat creation, identifies objectives for the development of more integrated methods, and demonstrates how promising recent developments and avenues of inquiry can help to meet these objectives.

Restoration EcologyVol. 33(8)
University of Manchester (GB), Helsinki Art Museum (FI)
Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.