Feature-Level Insights into the Progesterone–Estradiol Ratio in Postmenopausal Women Using Explainable Machine Learning

The protective role of progesterone against estradiol-driven proliferation is essential for preserving endometrial homeostasis. However, the factors that influence the progesterone–estradiol (P4:E2) ratio remain poorly characterized. This study aimed to model this ratio using a machine learning approach to identify key hormonal, anthropometric, demographic, dietary, metabolic, and inflammatory predictors. In addition, it aimed to assess estradiol and progesterone as individual outcomes to clarify whether shared or divergent mechanisms underlie variation in each hormone. NHANES data were used to identify postmenopausal women (n = 1902). An XGBoost model was developed to predict the log-transformed P4:E2 ratio using a 70/30 stratified train–test split. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values were computed to interpret feature contributions. The final XGBoost model for the log-transformed P4:E2 ratio achieved an RMSE of 0.746, an MAE of 0.574, and an R2 of 0.298 on the test set. SHAP analysis identified FSH (0.213), waist circumference (0.181), and CRP (0.133) as the most influential contributors, followed by total cholesterol (0.085) and LH (0.066). FSH and waist circumference emerged as key predictors of estradiol, while total cholesterol and LH were the most influential for progesterone. By leveraging SHAP-based feature importance to rank predictors of the P4:E2 ratio, this study provides interpretable, data-driven insights into the reproductive hormonal dynamics of postmenopausal women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ai6080187
Primary Topic
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feature-Level Insights into the Progesterone–Estradiol Ratio in Postmenopausal Women Using Explainable Machine Learning

Ajna Hamidovic, Mark R. Burge, John M. Davis
AI
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
article

Feature-Level Insights into the Progesterone–Estradiol Ratio in Postmenopausal Women Using Explainable Machine Learning

Ajna Hamidovic, Mark R. Burge, John M. Davis
article en

Abstract

The protective role of progesterone against estradiol-driven proliferation is essential for preserving endometrial homeostasis. However, the factors that influence the progesterone–estradiol (P4:E2) ratio remain poorly characterized. This study aimed to model this ratio using a machine learning approach to identify key hormonal, anthropometric, demographic, dietary, metabolic, and inflammatory predictors. In addition, it aimed to assess estradiol and progesterone as individual outcomes to clarify whether shared or divergent mechanisms underlie variation in each hormone. NHANES data were used to identify postmenopausal women (n = 1902). An XGBoost model was developed to predict the log-transformed P4:E2 ratio using a 70/30 stratified train–test split. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values were computed to interpret feature contributions. The final XGBoost model for the log-transformed P4:E2 ratio achieved an RMSE of 0.746, an MAE of 0.574, and an R2 of 0.298 on the test set. SHAP analysis identified FSH (0.213), waist circumference (0.181), and CRP (0.133) as the most influential contributors, followed by total cholesterol (0.085) and LH (0.066). FSH and waist circumference emerged as key predictors of estradiol, while total cholesterol and LH were the most influential for progesterone. By leveraging SHAP-based feature importance to rank predictors of the P4:E2 ratio, this study provides interpretable, data-driven insights into the reproductive hormonal dynamics of postmenopausal women.

AIVol. 6(8)
Illinois College (US), University of New Mexico (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.