Social Technology Use and Loneliness: Exploring Online and Offline Patterns and Preferences in Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults

This study examines socialisation patterns, preferences, and the relationship between social technology use and loneliness in young, middle-aged, and older adults. Survey data was collected from 1079 adults aged 18–90 (M age = 53.5, SD = 18.64). ANOVA was used to make comparisons between age groups while Spearman’s correlation and binary logistic regression were used to examine associations between social technology use and loneliness. The results show varying patterns of social technology use and associations with loneliness across age groups. For middle-aged and older adults, in-person socialization, phone calls, and texting (older adults only) reduced odds of loneliness by 16% to 30%. For young and middle-aged adults, the number of virtual contacts was associated with decreased loneliness, while for older adults only face-to-face interactions were associated with reduced loneliness. These findings highlight generational preferences in social contact and reinforce the importance of face-to-face interactions for alleviating loneliness. However, they also provide insights into virtual connections that are effective in reducing loneliness when in-person interactions are not available.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2543994
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Technology Use by Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Technology Use and Loneliness: Exploring Online and Offline Patterns and Preferences in Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults

Brooke Brady, Lidan Zheng, Kaarin Jane Anstey
1 citations
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Technology Use by Older Adults
5.59
article

Social Technology Use and Loneliness: Exploring Online and Offline Patterns and Preferences in Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults

Brooke Brady, Lidan Zheng, Kaarin Jane Anstey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examines socialisation patterns, preferences, and the relationship between social technology use and loneliness in young, middle-aged, and older adults. Survey data was collected from 1079 adults aged 18–90 (M age = 53.5, SD = 18.64). ANOVA was used to make comparisons between age groups while Spearman’s correlation and binary logistic regression were used to examine associations between social technology use and loneliness. The results show varying patterns of social technology use and associations with loneliness across age groups. For middle-aged and older adults, in-person socialization, phone calls, and texting (older adults only) reduced odds of loneliness by 16% to 30%. For young and middle-aged adults, the number of virtual contacts was associated with decreased loneliness, while for older adults only face-to-face interactions were associated with reduced loneliness. These findings highlight generational preferences in social contact and reinforce the importance of face-to-face interactions for alleviating loneliness. However, they also provide insights into virtual connections that are effective in reducing loneliness when in-person interactions are not available.

International Journal of Human-Computer InteractionVol. 42(7)
The University of Sydney (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Institute for Futures Studies (SE), Neuroscience Research Australia (AU)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Technology Use by Older Adults
5.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.