Stakeholders’ Perceptions of the Nature-Based Healing Industry in South Korea: A Q Methodology Study

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study explores the subjective perceptions of stakeholders in South Korea's nature-based healing industry and employs Q methodology to classify their viewpoints. As the healing industry continues to evolve across sectors such as forest therapy, marine healing, and healing agriculture, understanding diverse stakeholder perspectives is essential for informing coherent and inclusive policy development. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 25 participants-including policymakers, practitioners, and service users-sorted 39 statements derived from academic and media sources. This study analysed the data using Ken-Q software, applying principal component analysis with Varimax rotation. <b>Results:</b> The results revealed four distinct perception types: (1) a comprehensive and service-oriented type emphasising universal access and public benefit, (2) a professionalism-oriented type advocating for systematic administration and regional development, (3) a differentiation-oriented type concerned with conceptual clarity and distinctiveness, and (4) a sustainability-oriented type emphasising long-term impacts and collaborative structures. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings highlight the multi-dimensional nature of stakeholder perceptions and suggest the need for differentiated governance strategies. By incorporating public choice theory and complementary insights from health economics, this study provides an empirical foundation for understanding stakeholder-driven policy considerations in developing nature-based healing services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13161990
Primary Topic
Q Methodology Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholders’ Perceptions of the Nature-Based Healing Industry in South Korea: A Q Methodology Study

Ji Seong Yi, M Zhukova Yu, Song Yi Lee, Seung-Uoo Shin et al.
Healthcare
Q Methodology Applications
article

Stakeholders’ Perceptions of the Nature-Based Healing Industry in South Korea: A Q Methodology Study

Ji Seong Yi, M Zhukova Yu, Song Yi Lee, Seung-Uoo Shin, Jeong Hyun Kim, Yucheon Kim, Jin-hyeon Kim
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study explores the subjective perceptions of stakeholders in South Korea's nature-based healing industry and employs Q methodology to classify their viewpoints. As the healing industry continues to evolve across sectors such as forest therapy, marine healing, and healing agriculture, understanding diverse stakeholder perspectives is essential for informing coherent and inclusive policy development. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 25 participants-including policymakers, practitioners, and service users-sorted 39 statements derived from academic and media sources. This study analysed the data using Ken-Q software, applying principal component analysis with Varimax rotation. <b>Results:</b> The results revealed four distinct perception types: (1) a comprehensive and service-oriented type emphasising universal access and public benefit, (2) a professionalism-oriented type advocating for systematic administration and regional development, (3) a differentiation-oriented type concerned with conceptual clarity and distinctiveness, and (4) a sustainability-oriented type emphasising long-term impacts and collaborative structures. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings highlight the multi-dimensional nature of stakeholder perceptions and suggest the need for differentiated governance strategies. By incorporating public choice theory and complementary insights from health economics, this study provides an empirical foundation for understanding stakeholder-driven policy considerations in developing nature-based healing services.

HealthcareVol. 13(16)
University of Central Florida (US), Dongguk University (KR)
Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Q Methodology Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.