Deep Reinforcement and IL for Autonomous Driving: A Review in the CARLA Simulation Environment

Autonomous driving is a complex and fast-evolving domain at the intersection of robotics, machine learning, and control systems. This paper provides a systematic review of recent developments in reinforcement learning (RL) and imitation learning (IL) approaches for autonomous vehicle control, with a dedicated focus on the CARLA simulator, an open-source, high-fidelity platform that has become a standard for learning-based autonomous vehicle (AV) research. We analyze RL-based and IL-based studies, extracting and comparing their formulations of state, action, and reward spaces. Special attention is given to the design of reward functions, control architectures, and integration pipelines. Comparative graphs and diagrams illustrate performance trade-offs. We further highlight gaps in generalization to real-world driving scenarios, robustness under dynamic environments, and scalability of agent architectures. Despite rapid progress, existing autonomous driving systems exhibit significant limitations. For instance, studies show that end-to-end reinforcement learning (RL) models can suffer from performance degradation of up to 35% when exposed to unseen weather or town conditions, and imitation learning (IL) agents trained solely on expert demonstrations exhibit up to 40% higher collision rates in novel environments. Furthermore, reward misspecification remains a critical issue—over 20% of reported failures in simulated environments stem from poorly calibrated reward signals. Generalization gaps, especially in RL, also manifest in task-specific overfitting, with agents failing up to 60% of the time when faced with dynamic obstacles not encountered during training. These persistent shortcomings underscore the need for more robust and sample-efficient learning strategies. Finally, we discuss hybrid paradigms that integrate IL and RL, such as Generative Adversarial IL, and propose future research directions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15168972
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Reinforcement and IL for Autonomous Driving: A Review in the CARLA Simulation Environment

Mustafa Sakhai, Maciej Wielgosz, Bartosz Kawa, Piotr Czechowski
3 citations
Applied Sciences
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
2.05
article

Deep Reinforcement and IL for Autonomous Driving: A Review in the CARLA Simulation Environment

Mustafa Sakhai, Maciej Wielgosz, Bartosz Kawa, Piotr Czechowski
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Autonomous driving is a complex and fast-evolving domain at the intersection of robotics, machine learning, and control systems. This paper provides a systematic review of recent developments in reinforcement learning (RL) and imitation learning (IL) approaches for autonomous vehicle control, with a dedicated focus on the CARLA simulator, an open-source, high-fidelity platform that has become a standard for learning-based autonomous vehicle (AV) research. We analyze RL-based and IL-based studies, extracting and comparing their formulations of state, action, and reward spaces. Special attention is given to the design of reward functions, control architectures, and integration pipelines. Comparative graphs and diagrams illustrate performance trade-offs. We further highlight gaps in generalization to real-world driving scenarios, robustness under dynamic environments, and scalability of agent architectures. Despite rapid progress, existing autonomous driving systems exhibit significant limitations. For instance, studies show that end-to-end reinforcement learning (RL) models can suffer from performance degradation of up to 35% when exposed to unseen weather or town conditions, and imitation learning (IL) agents trained solely on expert demonstrations exhibit up to 40% higher collision rates in novel environments. Furthermore, reward misspecification remains a critical issue—over 20% of reported failures in simulated environments stem from poorly calibrated reward signals. Generalization gaps, especially in RL, also manifest in task-specific overfitting, with agents failing up to 60% of the time when faced with dynamic obstacles not encountered during training. These persistent shortcomings underscore the need for more robust and sample-efficient learning strategies. Finally, we discuss hybrid paradigms that integrate IL and RL, such as Generative Adversarial IL, and propose future research directions.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(16)
AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.