Peer Review of Open Educational Resource Textbooks

This article presents an investigation of the state of peer review for Open Educational Resource (OER) Textbooks, which denotes the variability of peer review practices across OER platforms. The environ-mental scan highlights the critical finding that the perception of quality between OER textbooks and commercially published or traditional textbooks is often linked to the presence or absence of a formal, pre-publication peer review process. Findings emphasized a strong preference on behalf of adopters and potential authors of OER textbooks to have a standardized process or guidance for pursuing pre-publication peer review. Thus, there is potential for future researchers, platforms, and practitioners to develop standardized OER peer-review options or OER platforms. This new infrastructure would be valuable for those looking for a pre-publication peer review and may help address perceptions of quality and bolster the adoption of OER textbooks and integration into higher education curriculum.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Southeastern Librarian
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62915/0038-3686.2136
Primary Topic
Open Education and E-Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peer Review of Open Educational Resource Textbooks

Helen Bischoff, Todd Seguin
The Southeastern Librarian
Open Education and E-Learning
article

Peer Review of Open Educational Resource Textbooks

Helen Bischoff, Todd Seguin
article en

Abstract

This article presents an investigation of the state of peer review for Open Educational Resource (OER) Textbooks, which denotes the variability of peer review practices across OER platforms. The environ-mental scan highlights the critical finding that the perception of quality between OER textbooks and commercially published or traditional textbooks is often linked to the presence or absence of a formal, pre-publication peer review process. Findings emphasized a strong preference on behalf of adopters and potential authors of OER textbooks to have a standardized process or guidance for pursuing pre-publication peer review. Thus, there is potential for future researchers, platforms, and practitioners to develop standardized OER peer-review options or OER platforms. This new infrastructure would be valuable for those looking for a pre-publication peer review and may help address perceptions of quality and bolster the adoption of OER textbooks and integration into higher education curriculum.

The Southeastern LibrarianVol. 73(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Open Education and E-Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.