Prognostic Impact of the AML60+ Score for Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Hypomethylating Agents: A Retrospective Multicentric Analysis

<b>Background:</b> The AML60+ score has been proposed for risk stratification in intensively treated elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS). Its prognostic impact in patients treated with hypomethylating agents (HMA) is unknown. <b>Methods:</b> Patients ≥ 60 years of age diagnosed with AML or MDS/AML according to ICC2022 were eligible for this retrospective and multicenter chart review if they had received at least one cycle of HMA-based treatment. <b>Results:</b> A cohort of 142 patients was analyzed. During follow-up (median 8 months), 114 patients died. The molecular Prognostic Score (mPRS) was available for 121 patients, the European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2022 classification for 117 patients, and the AML60+ for 105 patients. According to AML60+, 33 patients (31.4%) were classified as very poor risk, 36 (34.3%) as poor risk, and 34 (32.4%) as intermediate risk. Two patients (1.9%) were classified as favorable. Median overall survival (OS) was 21.7 months (mo) for the combined intermediate/favorable group, 7 mo for the poor risk group and 3 mo for the very poor risk group (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Cox regression analysis (reference category: very poor) showed a significantly lower risk of death for both intermediate/favorable risk patients (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.10-0.31, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and poor risk patients (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28-0.78, <i>p</i> = 0.004). The concordance score was 0.67 for AML60+, 0.60 for mPRS, and 0.58 for ELN2022. <b>Conclusions:</b> The AML60+ may represent a useful prognostic tool for elderly AML patients treated with HMA-based therapies. In particular, it could help to identify a group with a relatively favorable prognosis that is not clearly identified by the ELN2022 or the mPRS risk classification. However, analyses of larger cohorts are necessary to confirm our findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17162658
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic Impact of the AML60+ Score for Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Hypomethylating Agents: A Retrospective Multicentric Analysis

Christoph Driessen, Thomas Lehmann, Lukas Graf, Charlotte Micheloud et al.
1 citations
Cancers
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
1.77
article

Prognostic Impact of the AML60+ Score for Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Hypomethylating Agents: A Retrospective Multicentric Analysis

Christoph Driessen, Thomas Lehmann, Lukas Graf, Charlotte Micheloud, Ulrich Mey, Richard Cathomas, Matthias Weber, Jeroen S. Goede, Tobias Silzle, Stefan Fuchs, Sergio Cogliatti, Katrin Gobat, Verena Petermichl, Yannick Gerth
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> The AML60+ score has been proposed for risk stratification in intensively treated elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS). Its prognostic impact in patients treated with hypomethylating agents (HMA) is unknown. <b>Methods:</b> Patients ≥ 60 years of age diagnosed with AML or MDS/AML according to ICC2022 were eligible for this retrospective and multicenter chart review if they had received at least one cycle of HMA-based treatment. <b>Results:</b> A cohort of 142 patients was analyzed. During follow-up (median 8 months), 114 patients died. The molecular Prognostic Score (mPRS) was available for 121 patients, the European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2022 classification for 117 patients, and the AML60+ for 105 patients. According to AML60+, 33 patients (31.4%) were classified as very poor risk, 36 (34.3%) as poor risk, and 34 (32.4%) as intermediate risk. Two patients (1.9%) were classified as favorable. Median overall survival (OS) was 21.7 months (mo) for the combined intermediate/favorable group, 7 mo for the poor risk group and 3 mo for the very poor risk group (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Cox regression analysis (reference category: very poor) showed a significantly lower risk of death for both intermediate/favorable risk patients (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.10-0.31, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and poor risk patients (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28-0.78, <i>p</i> = 0.004). The concordance score was 0.67 for AML60+, 0.60 for mPRS, and 0.58 for ELN2022. <b>Conclusions:</b> The AML60+ may represent a useful prognostic tool for elderly AML patients treated with HMA-based therapies. In particular, it could help to identify a group with a relatively favorable prognosis that is not clearly identified by the ELN2022 or the mPRS risk classification. However, analyses of larger cohorts are necessary to confirm our findings.

CancersVol. 17(16)
University of St.Gallen (CH), Kantonsspital St. Gallen (CH), Kantonsspital Winterthur (CH), Swiss Cancer League (CH), Swiss Group For Clinical Cancer Research (CH), Kantonsspital Graubünden (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
1.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.