Multi-Model Collaborative Optimization of Inconel 690 Deposited Geometry in Laser-Directed Energy Deposition: Machine Learning Prediction and NSGA-II Decision Framework
The critical challenge of achieving precise geometric control in laser directed energy deposition (L-DED) of Inconel 690 for nuclear applications is addressed by this study. We established a data-driven optimization framework that reduces time-consuming trial-and-error experiments. A comprehensive process-geometry dataset was generated through full-factor experiments. Pearson correlation analysis revealed significant correlations: strong positive correlations between laser power and bead width (r = 0.82) and depth (r = 0.85), and between powder feed rate and height (r = 0.70). A hybrid machine learning model was subsequently developed. It used a Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN) to achieve excellent prediction of width, height, and depth (R2 ≤ 0.962). It also generated 100 uniformly distributed Pareto optimal process parameter sets via the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II). Experimental validation confirmed the model’s high predictive accuracy—relative error ≤ 5% for width/depth, and a maximum relative error of 5.34% for height. This demonstrates the framework’s effectiveness for reliable multi-objective process optimization in high-precision deposition tasks. It also highlights its potential for use in nuclear component repair and other material systems.
Authors
- Xiuyuan Yin
- Junxiao Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0765-3584)
- Chen Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3719-0421)
- Xiaoyu Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5933-1977)
- Changsheng Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3097-7608)
- Shuo Shang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1117-2890)
Institutions
- Northeastern University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Metals
- Published
- 2025-08-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/met15080905
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.71