HELMET (HEaLth iMpact of E-bikes and e-scooTers) study: Data collection methods and information gathered for the evaluation of the introduction of share-hire schemes
<ns7:p>Background This study aimed to collect and summarise information on e-bike and e-scooter use in areas with and without e-bike (EB) and e-bike plus e-scooter (EB+ES) combined share-hire schemes. Methods This study employed a repeated cross-sectional design. An online survey asking questions about demographics, travel, and health was completed by people in August and September 2023 before the schemes were launched in Bristol (EB+ES) and Leeds (EB), with Bradford and Sheffield as control sites. A resurvey was conducted at the same sites one year later, but also in Bath (EB+ES) and Plymouth (EB). We also interviewed eight e-bike and e-scooter users and non-users in Bristol (n=4) and Leeds (n=4). Results Following data cleaning, 3771 remained in the baseline sample and 5370 remained in the resurvey sample. The majority of participants reported having never used an e-bike (baseline: 61%; resurvey: 69%) or e-scooter (baseline: 77%; resurvey: 84%). At baseline, the most common e-bike access route was the use of their own e-bike (45%), with access via a share-hire scheme lower at 25%. In the resurvey sample, access levels were similar via a share-hire scheme (38%) and personal e-bikes (36%). The most common e-scooter access route was a share-hire scheme (baseline: 60%; resurvey: 74%). The most common weekly e-bike and e-scooter destinations were leisure/leisure venues, followed by work/education and shopping/errands. Half said they would not use an e-bike scheme and 63% indicated they would not use an e-scooter scheme. Potential users were willing to walk ~500 m to access an e-bike/e-scooter. Interviewees generally supported share-hire schemes, seeing them as a good addition to the wider transport offer, but with more support for e-bikes and reservations around e-scooters. Conclusions These data will be important for a later evaluation of EB and EB+ES share-hire schemes on public health, social, economic, and environmental factors.</ns7:p>
Authors
- Tim Jones (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5187-5654)
- Ben Spencer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4806-8509)
- Ruth Salway (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3242-3951)
- Roland Roberts
- James Garbutt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4622-4574)
- Russell Jago (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3394-0176)
- Ian Philips (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1938-7842)
- Sabina Sanghera (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8387-3103)
- Frank de Vocht (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3631-627X)
- Miranda Elaine Glynis Armstrong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8946-5776)
- Lester C. Welch
Institutions
- Oxford Brookes University (GB)
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- At Bristol (GB)
- Department for Transport (GB)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- NIHR Open Research
- Published
- 2025-08-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13857.2
- Primary Topic
- Transportation and Mobility Innovations
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Department of Health and Social Care
- Imperial College London
- Public Health Research Programme
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West