Comparative Assessment of Azithromycin and Erythromycin for Identifying Inducible Clindamycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

Background <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> remains a significant pathogen responsible for a wide range of infections. Clindamycin is frequently employed as an effective alternative for treating Staphylococcal infections. However, the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, particularly inducible clindamycin resistance (ICR), poses a substantial therapeutic challenge. Routine detection of ICR is crucial to prevent therapeutic failures and ensure appropriate use of clindamycin. Identifying a suitable substitute for erythromycin in resource-limited settings could enhance the reliability and feasibility of ICR detection in clinical laboratories. This study aimed to assess whether azithromycin could serve as a reliable alternative inducer for the detection of ICR in <i>S. aureus</i> and to compare its results with the standard erythromycin-induced D-test. Material and methods A cross-sectional comparative study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital setting. A total of 216 non-duplicate clinical isolates of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> were subjected to the D-test using both erythromycin and azithromycin in combination with clindamycin. The erythromycin-induced clindamycin resistance test, as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), served as the reference method. Interpretation of azithromycin-induced D-test results was based on adapted CLSI criteria used for erythromycin. Result Of the 216 <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> isolates tested, the iMLSB phenotype was most common with 52.31% isolates (n=113), followed by 12.03% cMLSB (n=26) and macrolide-streptogramin (MS) (17.21%, n=37). Our findings show 100% agreement between the test method (using azithromycin) and the reference method (using erythromycin) for the determination of ICR. Conclusion This study demonstrates that azithromycin may be a viable alternative to erythromycin for detecting inducible clindamycin resistance in clinical isolates of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>. Incorporating azithromycin in routine susceptibility testing could offer a practical substitute, particularly in settings where erythromycin is unavailable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.90166
Primary Topic
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Assessment of Azithromycin and Erythromycin for Identifying Inducible Clindamycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

Abhishek Kumar, Anupama Singh, Mukesh Kumar, Pooja Kumar et al.
Cureus
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
article

Comparative Assessment of Azithromycin and Erythromycin for Identifying Inducible Clindamycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

Abhishek Kumar, Anupama Singh, Mukesh Kumar, Pooja Kumar, Archana Lnu
article en

Abstract

Background <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> remains a significant pathogen responsible for a wide range of infections. Clindamycin is frequently employed as an effective alternative for treating Staphylococcal infections. However, the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, particularly inducible clindamycin resistance (ICR), poses a substantial therapeutic challenge. Routine detection of ICR is crucial to prevent therapeutic failures and ensure appropriate use of clindamycin. Identifying a suitable substitute for erythromycin in resource-limited settings could enhance the reliability and feasibility of ICR detection in clinical laboratories. This study aimed to assess whether azithromycin could serve as a reliable alternative inducer for the detection of ICR in <i>S. aureus</i> and to compare its results with the standard erythromycin-induced D-test. Material and methods A cross-sectional comparative study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital setting. A total of 216 non-duplicate clinical isolates of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> were subjected to the D-test using both erythromycin and azithromycin in combination with clindamycin. The erythromycin-induced clindamycin resistance test, as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), served as the reference method. Interpretation of azithromycin-induced D-test results was based on adapted CLSI criteria used for erythromycin. Result Of the 216 <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> isolates tested, the iMLSB phenotype was most common with 52.31% isolates (n=113), followed by 12.03% cMLSB (n=26) and macrolide-streptogramin (MS) (17.21%, n=37). Our findings show 100% agreement between the test method (using azithromycin) and the reference method (using erythromycin) for the determination of ICR. Conclusion This study demonstrates that azithromycin may be a viable alternative to erythromycin for detecting inducible clindamycin resistance in clinical isolates of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>. Incorporating azithromycin in routine susceptibility testing could offer a practical substitute, particularly in settings where erythromycin is unavailable.

CureusVol. 17(8)
Patna Medical College and Hospital (IN), Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Employees' State Insurance Model Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.