Perceptions of Male Facial Attractiveness: Evaluating Profile Changes Through the Eyes of Laypeople, Orthodontists, and Dentists.

Objective: To evaluate the aesthetic perception of facial profile changes caused by varying maxillary and mandibular projections, comparing the preferences and sensitivity of laypersons, orthodontists, and general dentists. Materials and Methods: A series of digitally altered profile images representing incremental advancements and retrusions of the maxilla and mandible were presented to three groups: laypersons, orthodontists, and general dentists. Participants answered a series of questions on attractiveness and statistical analysis was conducted to compare intergroup differences in aesthetic preferences and tolerance thresholds for skeletal changes. Results: Orthodontists demonstrated the highest sensitivity to skeletal discrepancies, preferring profiles closer to cephalometric norms. General dentists exhibited moderate sensitivity, while laypersons showed a broader range of acceptance and often favoured slightly convex profiles with maxillary protrusion. Alterations in mandibular projection had a greater impact on aesthetic ratings than maxillary changes across all groups. Conclusion: Perceptions of profile aesthetics vary significantly among professional and non-professional observers. Understanding these differences is critical for treatment planning, particularly in orthognathic and orthodontic cases where patient satisfaction and aesthetic expectations must be balanced with clinical objectives.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i04.53662
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions of Male Facial Attractiveness: Evaluating Profile Changes Through the Eyes of Laypeople, Orthodontists, and Dentists.

Prathyaksha Shetty, G C Chidanandeswara, S. V. De Noronha, G C Ramesh et al.
1 links
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
article

Perceptions of Male Facial Attractiveness: Evaluating Profile Changes Through the Eyes of Laypeople, Orthodontists, and Dentists.

Prathyaksha Shetty, G C Chidanandeswara, S. V. De Noronha, G C Ramesh, E P Shashidhar, B.S. Malthesh
article en

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the aesthetic perception of facial profile changes caused by varying maxillary and mandibular projections, comparing the preferences and sensitivity of laypersons, orthodontists, and general dentists. Materials and Methods: A series of digitally altered profile images representing incremental advancements and retrusions of the maxilla and mandible were presented to three groups: laypersons, orthodontists, and general dentists. Participants answered a series of questions on attractiveness and statistical analysis was conducted to compare intergroup differences in aesthetic preferences and tolerance thresholds for skeletal changes. Results: Orthodontists demonstrated the highest sensitivity to skeletal discrepancies, preferring profiles closer to cephalometric norms. General dentists exhibited moderate sensitivity, while laypersons showed a broader range of acceptance and often favoured slightly convex profiles with maxillary protrusion. Alterations in mandibular projection had a greater impact on aesthetic ratings than maxillary changes across all groups. Conclusion: Perceptions of profile aesthetics vary significantly among professional and non-professional observers. Understanding these differences is critical for treatment planning, particularly in orthognathic and orthodontic cases where patient satisfaction and aesthetic expectations must be balanced with clinical objectives.

International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 7(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.