The Association Between Protective Factors and Children’s Subjective Well-being: A Comparative Cross-National Analysis

Abstract This study investigates the role of protective experiences in fostering children’s subjective well-being across 27 countries, using a large dataset of 10-year-olds ( N = 49,428). While protective factors are well-established in buffering against negative outcomes and poor mental health, their potential to actively promote children’s subjective well-being has received comparatively little attention. Addressing this gap, the study explores the promotive function of such factors. Drawing upon the protective and compensatory experiences (PACEs) model, we identified nine key factors validated using confirmatory factor analysis across three domains: relational, physical, and enriching resources. Results indicated that these factors significantly predicted children’s well-being. Four factors—family relations, friendships, teacher support, and home safety—emerged as the strongest predictors of children's subjective well-being. The model’s predictive power varied across countries, explaining 30–40% of well-being variance in most cases, with some critical differences between nations. Moreover, further country-focused analysis showed certain experiences, particularly religion, were only relevant in specific countries. This study underscores the importance of protective experiences for children’s well-being, highlighting the PACEs model’s utility. Cross-national differences in the model’s effectiveness indicate the need for culturally sensitive applications and the need for culturally informed policies. These findings point to the importance of culturally informed policies and targeted efforts to strengthen protective factors. Future research should further investigate how different protective experiences function across cultural settings to support children’s flourishing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Adversity and Resilience Science
Published
2025-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42844-025-00177-0
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Association Between Protective Factors and Children’s Subjective Well-being: A Comparative Cross-National Analysis

Daphna Gross‐Manos, Hanita Kosher, Amanda Sheffield Morris, Jennifer Hays
1 links
Adversity and Resilience Science
Resilience and Mental Health
article

The Association Between Protective Factors and Children’s Subjective Well-being: A Comparative Cross-National Analysis

Daphna Gross‐Manos, Hanita Kosher, Amanda Sheffield Morris, Jennifer Hays
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the role of protective experiences in fostering children’s subjective well-being across 27 countries, using a large dataset of 10-year-olds ( N = 49,428). While protective factors are well-established in buffering against negative outcomes and poor mental health, their potential to actively promote children’s subjective well-being has received comparatively little attention. Addressing this gap, the study explores the promotive function of such factors. Drawing upon the protective and compensatory experiences (PACEs) model, we identified nine key factors validated using confirmatory factor analysis across three domains: relational, physical, and enriching resources. Results indicated that these factors significantly predicted children’s well-being. Four factors—family relations, friendships, teacher support, and home safety—emerged as the strongest predictors of children's subjective well-being. The model’s predictive power varied across countries, explaining 30–40% of well-being variance in most cases, with some critical differences between nations. Moreover, further country-focused analysis showed certain experiences, particularly religion, were only relevant in specific countries. This study underscores the importance of protective experiences for children’s well-being, highlighting the PACEs model’s utility. Cross-national differences in the model’s effectiveness indicate the need for culturally sensitive applications and the need for culturally informed policies. These findings point to the importance of culturally informed policies and targeted efforts to strengthen protective factors. Future research should further investigate how different protective experiences function across cultural settings to support children’s flourishing.

Adversity and Resilience ScienceVol. 6(4)
Oklahoma State University (US), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Tel Hai Academic College (IL), Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences (US)
Jacobs Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.