The Battlefield and the Wire: Linking Cyber and Material Conflicts, 2000–2014

Abstract This paper describes how cyber and material conflicts overlaps in the international system. Given countries’ international alliances and conflicts, as well as their technical abilities, we want to uncover whether or not countries engage in cross-domain operations. Combining a dataset collecting information on cyber interactions between rival states and ICEWS data, we analyze cyber conflict among states and contextualize it into the system of international relations using social network analysis and the tool of multiplex networks from 2000 to 2014. We find support for our hypothesis that cross-domain operations are relatively rare. Furthermore, we find that: (a) the use of cyber tools is less frequent than the use of physical force; (b) there are some localized conflictual relations in the physical world, a circumstance that does not occur in the virtual world; (c) Russia seems to balance material aggressions and cyber-attacks, whereas the US prefer material conflict, and China is more active in the cyber realm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Peace Economics Peace Science and Public Policy
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2025-0050
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Battlefield and the Wire: Linking Cyber and Material Conflicts, 2000–2014

Roberto Ricciuti, Adelaide Baronchelli
Peace Economics Peace Science and Public Policy
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

The Battlefield and the Wire: Linking Cyber and Material Conflicts, 2000–2014

Roberto Ricciuti, Adelaide Baronchelli
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper describes how cyber and material conflicts overlaps in the international system. Given countries’ international alliances and conflicts, as well as their technical abilities, we want to uncover whether or not countries engage in cross-domain operations. Combining a dataset collecting information on cyber interactions between rival states and ICEWS data, we analyze cyber conflict among states and contextualize it into the system of international relations using social network analysis and the tool of multiplex networks from 2000 to 2014. We find support for our hypothesis that cross-domain operations are relatively rare. Furthermore, we find that: (a) the use of cyber tools is less frequent than the use of physical force; (b) there are some localized conflictual relations in the physical world, a circumstance that does not occur in the virtual world; (c) Russia seems to balance material aggressions and cyber-attacks, whereas the US prefer material conflict, and China is more active in the cyber realm.

Peace Economics Peace Science and Public Policy
University of Verona (IT), Ifo Institute for Economic Research (DE), University of Turin (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Battlefield and the Wire: Linking Cyber and Material Conflicts, 2000–2014 — Roberto Ricciuti, Adelaide Baronchelli · Peace Economics Peace Science and Public Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS