Delineating the Intricate Impact of Carbon in All‐solid‐state Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries

Abstract All‐solid‐state lithium‐sulfur batteries (ASSLSBs) offer enhanced safety, energy density, and cost efficiency. However, the insulating nature of sulfur necessitates excessive conductive carbon to support sulfur redox. Common sulfide solid‐state electrolytes (SSEs) like Li 5.5 PS 4.5 Cl 1.5 decompose electrochemically within the operating voltage range of sulfur, a process enhanced by intimate contact with carbon. While this decomposition increases cell capacity, it reduces ionic conductivity, and its link to carbon characteristics in sulfur cathodes remains underexplored. Herein, the relationship between carbon specific surface area (SSA) and SSE decomposition in sulfur cathodes is examined. It is established that carbon blending can form a robust electronic conducting network that enhances both SSE and sulfur redox independently of carbon SSA. With a second derivative analysis (SDA), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and a galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT), sulfur redox is separated from SSE redox, and active material loss is established as the dominant failure mechanism. Carbon blending with nanofibers is shown to mitigate cell fading despite increasing SSE decomposition. Finally, optimized cathodes are synthesized with high SSE and sulfur capacity capable of high‐rate cycling and cycling at high S‐loading against Li‐metal. The study highlights how tailoring carbon blends can significantly improve sulfur utilization, cyclability, and rate performance in ASSLSBs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Energy Materials
Published
2025-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202502557
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Delineating the Intricate Impact of Carbon in All‐solid‐state Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries

Arumugam Manthiram, Gordon Jarrold
4 citations
Advanced Energy Materials
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
2.92
article

Delineating the Intricate Impact of Carbon in All‐solid‐state Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries

Arumugam Manthiram, Gordon Jarrold
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract All‐solid‐state lithium‐sulfur batteries (ASSLSBs) offer enhanced safety, energy density, and cost efficiency. However, the insulating nature of sulfur necessitates excessive conductive carbon to support sulfur redox. Common sulfide solid‐state electrolytes (SSEs) like Li 5.5 PS 4.5 Cl 1.5 decompose electrochemically within the operating voltage range of sulfur, a process enhanced by intimate contact with carbon. While this decomposition increases cell capacity, it reduces ionic conductivity, and its link to carbon characteristics in sulfur cathodes remains underexplored. Herein, the relationship between carbon specific surface area (SSA) and SSE decomposition in sulfur cathodes is examined. It is established that carbon blending can form a robust electronic conducting network that enhances both SSE and sulfur redox independently of carbon SSA. With a second derivative analysis (SDA), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and a galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT), sulfur redox is separated from SSE redox, and active material loss is established as the dominant failure mechanism. Carbon blending with nanofibers is shown to mitigate cell fading despite increasing SSE decomposition. Finally, optimized cathodes are synthesized with high SSE and sulfur capacity capable of high‐rate cycling and cycling at high S‐loading against Li‐metal. The study highlights how tailoring carbon blends can significantly improve sulfur utilization, cyclability, and rate performance in ASSLSBs.

Advanced Energy MaterialsVol. 15(39)
Walker (United States) (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Division of Materials Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
2.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.