Immigration salience and double standards: differential impacts on prejudice and far-right support between Ukrainian refugees and other immigrant groups / <i>La saliencia de la inmigración y los dobles estándares: impactos diferenciales en los prejui

This research examined whether highlighting immigration as a major societal issue increases anti-immigrant prejudice and far-right support, particularly among social conservatives. We also explored whether this effect would be weaker when salience involves immigrant groups that are normatively protected, such as Ukrainian refugees, compared to other groups. Across two studies conducted in Switzerland ( N = 439) and France ( N = 382), participants were randomly assigned to either a control or a salience condition in which immigration was framed as a major societal issue. Participants then recalled immigration-related news, allowing for a comparison between salience attributed to Ukrainian refugees versus other immigrant groups. Results showed that immigration salience did not increase prejudice or far-right support when focused on Ukrainian refugees. However, when salience was associated with other immigrant groups, it significantly increased anti-immigrant prejudice and far-right support, especially among social conservatives. These findings suggest that immigration salience can increase double standards in attitudes towards immigrants, with negative effects mitigated when attention is directed towards normatively protected groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social
Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02134748251351430
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immigration salience and double standards: differential impacts on prejudice and far-right support between Ukrainian refugees and other immigrant groups / La saliencia de la inmigración y los dobles estándares: impactos diferenciales en los prejui

Eva G. T. Green, Juan Manuel Falomir‐Pichastor, Matthieu Vétois
1 citations
International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social
Social and Intergroup Psychology
4.20
article

Immigration salience and double standards: differential impacts on prejudice and far-right support between Ukrainian refugees and other immigrant groups / La saliencia de la inmigración y los dobles estándares: impactos diferenciales en los prejui

Eva G. T. Green, Juan Manuel Falomir‐Pichastor, Matthieu Vétois
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This research examined whether highlighting immigration as a major societal issue increases anti-immigrant prejudice and far-right support, particularly among social conservatives. We also explored whether this effect would be weaker when salience involves immigrant groups that are normatively protected, such as Ukrainian refugees, compared to other groups. Across two studies conducted in Switzerland ( N = 439) and France ( N = 382), participants were randomly assigned to either a control or a salience condition in which immigration was framed as a major societal issue. Participants then recalled immigration-related news, allowing for a comparison between salience attributed to Ukrainian refugees versus other immigrant groups. Results showed that immigration salience did not increase prejudice or far-right support when focused on Ukrainian refugees. However, when salience was associated with other immigrant groups, it significantly increased anti-immigrant prejudice and far-right support, especially among social conservatives. These findings suggest that immigration salience can increase double standards in attitudes towards immigrants, with negative effects mitigated when attention is directed towards normatively protected groups.

International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología SocialVol. 40(2-3)
University of Geneva (CH), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Psychology (CZ), University of Lausanne (CH)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.