Evolution on the Size of Protected Metal Clusters by Assembly of Au<sub>4</sub> and Au<sub>6</sub> Units

Perfect tetrahedra and octahedra are the fundamental building blocks of FCC lattices; however, even distorted versions of these polyhedra can assemble into periodic HCP and BCC metal structures. In the case of protected metal clusters (PMCs), protecting ligands such as thiols, alkynyls, carbenes, and phosphines are responsible for the observed distortion of their metal frameworks due to the strong covalency of M-S, M-C, and M-P bonds (M stands for metal atoms). This work examines the assembly of tetrahedral and octahedral units and their relationship to the inner cores of PMCs. For instance, a perfect or distorted tetrahedron can share 1, 2, or 3 vertices with another tetrahedron, forming M<sub>7</sub>(<i>D</i> <sub>3<i>d</i></sub> or <i>D</i> <sub>3<i>h</i></sub> ), M<sub>6</sub>(<i>D</i> <sub>2<i>h</i></sub> or <i>C</i> <sub>2<i>h</i></sub> ), and M<sub>5</sub>(<i>D</i> <sub>3<i>h</i></sub> ) units, respectively. Accordingly, M<sub>7</sub> units containing differently oriented tetrahedra can serve as building blocks for the FCC and HCP structures. Similarly, one octahedron sharing 1, 2, and 3 vertices yields M<sub>11</sub>(<i>D</i> <sub>4<i>h</i></sub> or <i>D</i> <sub>2<i>h</i></sub> ), M<sub>10</sub>(<i>D</i> <sub>2<i>h</i></sub> ), and M<sub>9</sub>(<i>D</i> <sub>3<i>h</i></sub> ) units, respectively. The assembly of one octahedron and two tetrahedra along one <i>C</i> <sub>3</sub> axis yields an M<sub>8</sub> unit displaying <i>D</i> <sub>3<i>d</i></sub> , <i>D</i> <sub>2<i>h</i></sub> , or <i>C</i> <sub>2<i>h</i></sub> symmetry. In contrast, the icosahedral M<sub>13</sub> cluster is composed of 20 distorted tetrahedra, while an M<sub>12</sub> shell can be identified in structures formed by 20 octahedra. Regarding decahedral structures, they contain pentagonal bipyramids (M<sub>7</sub> units with a <i>D</i> <sub>5<i>h</i></sub> symmetry) assembled with five distorted tetrahedra. It is noteworthy that unlike in FCC or HCP atomic arrangements, M<sub>5</sub>, M<sub>7</sub>, and M<sub>9</sub> units are not present in BCC lattices. This study implements an algorithm that successfully generates atomic positions by capping an inner core with tetrahedra or octahedra, revealing the pivotal role of the type and distribution of polyhedral units in defining the anatomy and bonding of PMCs, and offering new insights into their structural understanding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Omega
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c05447
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolution on the Size of Protected Metal Clusters by Assembly of Au4 and Au6 Units

Alfredo Tlahuice‐Flores
1 citations
ACS Omega
Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications
0.52
article

Evolution on the Size of Protected Metal Clusters by Assembly of Au4 and Au6 Units

Alfredo Tlahuice‐Flores
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Perfect tetrahedra and octahedra are the fundamental building blocks of FCC lattices; however, even distorted versions of these polyhedra can assemble into periodic HCP and BCC metal structures. In the case of protected metal clusters (PMCs), protecting ligands such as thiols, alkynyls, carbenes, and phosphines are responsible for the observed distortion of their metal frameworks due to the strong covalency of M-S, M-C, and M-P bonds (M stands for metal atoms). This work examines the assembly of tetrahedral and octahedral units and their relationship to the inner cores of PMCs. For instance, a perfect or distorted tetrahedron can share 1, 2, or 3 vertices with another tetrahedron, forming M<sub>7</sub>(<i>D</i> <sub>3<i>d</i></sub> or <i>D</i> <sub>3<i>h</i></sub> ), M<sub>6</sub>(<i>D</i> <sub>2<i>h</i></sub> or <i>C</i> <sub>2<i>h</i></sub> ), and M<sub>5</sub>(<i>D</i> <sub>3<i>h</i></sub> ) units, respectively. Accordingly, M<sub>7</sub> units containing differently oriented tetrahedra can serve as building blocks for the FCC and HCP structures. Similarly, one octahedron sharing 1, 2, and 3 vertices yields M<sub>11</sub>(<i>D</i> <sub>4<i>h</i></sub> or <i>D</i> <sub>2<i>h</i></sub> ), M<sub>10</sub>(<i>D</i> <sub>2<i>h</i></sub> ), and M<sub>9</sub>(<i>D</i> <sub>3<i>h</i></sub> ) units, respectively. The assembly of one octahedron and two tetrahedra along one <i>C</i> <sub>3</sub> axis yields an M<sub>8</sub> unit displaying <i>D</i> <sub>3<i>d</i></sub> , <i>D</i> <sub>2<i>h</i></sub> , or <i>C</i> <sub>2<i>h</i></sub> symmetry. In contrast, the icosahedral M<sub>13</sub> cluster is composed of 20 distorted tetrahedra, while an M<sub>12</sub> shell can be identified in structures formed by 20 octahedra. Regarding decahedral structures, they contain pentagonal bipyramids (M<sub>7</sub> units with a <i>D</i> <sub>5<i>h</i></sub> symmetry) assembled with five distorted tetrahedra. It is noteworthy that unlike in FCC or HCP atomic arrangements, M<sub>5</sub>, M<sub>7</sub>, and M<sub>9</sub> units are not present in BCC lattices. This study implements an algorithm that successfully generates atomic positions by capping an inner core with tetrahedra or octahedra, revealing the pivotal role of the type and distribution of polyhedral units in defining the anatomy and bonding of PMCs, and offering new insights into their structural understanding.

ACS OmegaVol. 10(33)
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (MX), Institute of Mathematical Sciences (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.