The Efficiency of Water Vapor on Top‐of‐Atmosphere Radiation

Abstract Earth's climate sensitivity is greatly affected by the compensation between temperature feedback and water vapor (WV) feedback. Using abrupt 4xCO 2 experiments, we show that the global‐mean WV feedback is nearly a linear function of the temperature feedback, the slope of which is explained by the longwave radiative efficiency of WV . Although remains constant across models in the global mean, it exhibits substantial spatial variations and is particularly weak in Antarctica, where near‐surface inversions decouple the surface from the free troposphere. We introduce a surface–free troposphere temperature difference (SFTD) metric, showing that positive SFTD (e.g., high lifting condensation level) amplifies , while negative SFTD (e.g., strong surface inversion) suppresses it. These findings provide a clear explanation of how local climate conditions modulate the radiative compensation between temperature and WV feedbacks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2025-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl115210
Primary Topic
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Efficiency of Water Vapor on Top‐of‐Atmosphere Radiation

Nicole Feldl, David Paynter, Jing Feng, Zhihong Tan et al.
Geophysical Research Letters
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
article

The Efficiency of Water Vapor on Top‐of‐Atmosphere Radiation

Nicole Feldl, David Paynter, Jing Feng, Zhihong Tan, Pu Lin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Earth's climate sensitivity is greatly affected by the compensation between temperature feedback and water vapor (WV) feedback. Using abrupt 4xCO 2 experiments, we show that the global‐mean WV feedback is nearly a linear function of the temperature feedback, the slope of which is explained by the longwave radiative efficiency of WV . Although remains constant across models in the global mean, it exhibits substantial spatial variations and is particularly weak in Antarctica, where near‐surface inversions decouple the surface from the free troposphere. We introduce a surface–free troposphere temperature difference (SFTD) metric, showing that positive SFTD (e.g., high lifting condensation level) amplifies , while negative SFTD (e.g., strong surface inversion) suppresses it. These findings provide a clear explanation of how local climate conditions modulate the radiative compensation between temperature and WV feedbacks.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 52(16)
University of California, Santa Cruz (US), NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (US), Princeton University (US)
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.