Comparative Evaluation of Polyester and Polyether Polyurethane Foams for <i>Escherichia coli</i> Adsorption in Water Disinfection

In 2022, an estimated 1.7 billion people globally lacked access to safe drinking water, with more than 100 million still relying on untreated surface water. Contamination of water with fecal bacteria can cause a variety of diseases. Many methods have been proposed and used to remove bacteria from drinking water. However, many of these methods still are not broadly used in remote areas, as they can be inefficient, require chemicals, or use complicated operational procedures. This study conducts an initial investigation of the potential of polyurethane foams for water disinfection. Specifically, we compared polyester polyurethane (PESPU) and polyether polyurethane (PU) foams with similar morphologies for <i>Escherichia coli</i> (<i>E. coli</i>) adsorption. The relationship between foam properties (surface charge, surface energy, and surface chemistry) and bacterial removal efficiency was investigated to identify the critical aspects for future adsorbent development. It was found that the PESPU foam achieved a bacterial log reduction of approximately 2.9 for<i>E. coli</i> when immersed in a solution with an initial concentration of 10<sup>4</sup>-10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL for 1 h, whereas the PU foam showed negligible effectiveness under the same conditions. It was discovered that the PESPU foam exhibited a larger surface charge and surface energy than the PU foam, which likely contributed positively to its superior performance. This study is a step toward improving new foams employing surface charge, surface energy, and surface chemistry to improve bacterial adsorption effectiveness and provide accessible water treatment for underserved locations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Omega
Published
2025-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c02721
Primary Topic
Membrane Separation Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of Polyester and Polyether Polyurethane Foams for Escherichia coli Adsorption in Water Disinfection

Mina Mahdian, Benjamin D. Hatton, Dalal Asker, Amy M. Bilton et al.
ACS Omega
Membrane Separation Technologies
article

Comparative Evaluation of Polyester and Polyether Polyurethane Foams for Escherichia coli Adsorption in Water Disinfection

Mina Mahdian, Benjamin D. Hatton, Dalal Asker, Amy M. Bilton, D. Jordan Bouchard
article en

Abstract

In 2022, an estimated 1.7 billion people globally lacked access to safe drinking water, with more than 100 million still relying on untreated surface water. Contamination of water with fecal bacteria can cause a variety of diseases. Many methods have been proposed and used to remove bacteria from drinking water. However, many of these methods still are not broadly used in remote areas, as they can be inefficient, require chemicals, or use complicated operational procedures. This study conducts an initial investigation of the potential of polyurethane foams for water disinfection. Specifically, we compared polyester polyurethane (PESPU) and polyether polyurethane (PU) foams with similar morphologies for <i>Escherichia coli</i> (<i>E. coli</i>) adsorption. The relationship between foam properties (surface charge, surface energy, and surface chemistry) and bacterial removal efficiency was investigated to identify the critical aspects for future adsorbent development. It was found that the PESPU foam achieved a bacterial log reduction of approximately 2.9 for<i>E. coli</i> when immersed in a solution with an initial concentration of 10<sup>4</sup>-10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL for 1 h, whereas the PU foam showed negligible effectiveness under the same conditions. It was discovered that the PESPU foam exhibited a larger surface charge and surface energy than the PU foam, which likely contributed positively to its superior performance. This study is a step toward improving new foams employing surface charge, surface energy, and surface chemistry to improve bacterial adsorption effectiveness and provide accessible water treatment for underserved locations.

ACS OmegaVol. 10(33)
University of Toronto (CA), Institute of Food Science & Technology (GB), Alexandria University (EG)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Membrane Separation Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.