Regulatory Stringency and Impacts on Equity and Innovation in Medical Devices: Insights from the EU MDR 2017 and Considerations for the FDA

The new EU Medical Device Regulations (MDR), originally put forth in 2017, aimed to improve medical device safety in light of regulatory failures. However, although the MDR have improved safety requirements, they have inadvertently created barriers for innovation which have disproportionately impacted small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and orphan device manufacturers. This commentary explores the unintended consequences of the EU MDR as a cautionary case study for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), emphasizing the need to balance regulations. In particular, this commentary discusses the mechanisms by which increased evidence requirements, extended approval timelines, and increased costs have led to market contraction which threaten patient health. Creative solutions are proposed including provisional approvals, subsidized applications, and international recognition agreements. The implications and precedent set by the MDR are used to forewarn emerging regulations in artificial intelligence-enabled medical devices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Regulatory Science
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21423/jrs.regsci.131307
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulatory Stringency and Impacts on Equity and Innovation in Medical Devices: Insights from the EU MDR 2017 and Considerations for the FDA

Stefan Thottunkal
Journal of Regulatory Science
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
article

Regulatory Stringency and Impacts on Equity and Innovation in Medical Devices: Insights from the EU MDR 2017 and Considerations for the FDA

Stefan Thottunkal
article en

Abstract

The new EU Medical Device Regulations (MDR), originally put forth in 2017, aimed to improve medical device safety in light of regulatory failures. However, although the MDR have improved safety requirements, they have inadvertently created barriers for innovation which have disproportionately impacted small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and orphan device manufacturers. This commentary explores the unintended consequences of the EU MDR as a cautionary case study for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), emphasizing the need to balance regulations. In particular, this commentary discusses the mechanisms by which increased evidence requirements, extended approval timelines, and increased costs have led to market contraction which threaten patient health. Creative solutions are proposed including provisional approvals, subsidized applications, and international recognition agreements. The implications and precedent set by the MDR are used to forewarn emerging regulations in artificial intelligence-enabled medical devices.

Journal of Regulatory ScienceVol. 13(1)
Stanford Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Regulatory Stringency and Impacts on Equity and Innovation in Medical Devices: Insights from the EU MDR 2017 and Considerations for the FDA — Stefan Thottunkal · Journal of Regulatory Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS