Quo Vadis Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Setelah Amar Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 168/PUU-XXI/2023

After the Constitutional Court (MK) published Decision Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023, which was read aloud in an open plenary session of the Constitutional Court on October 31, 2024, employment law standards underwent changes. The court stressed that employers and employees must engage in bipartite discussions through debate to reach an agreement if workers/laborers reject Termination of Employment (PHK). Additionally, the layoff can only be carried out following a decision from an industrial relations dispute resolution body whose ruling has permanent legal force (inkracht) if bipartite negotiations fail to result in an agreement. With a focus on the inventory of positive law, legal doctrine, and principles, this study employs a normative legal method. Employers must therefore take into account the following dynamics: employers are not allowed to implement layoffs until they have received a decision from an industrial relations dispute resolution body that has permanent legal force, and every worker rejection of layoffs must be preceded by bipartite negotiations through deliberation to reach consensus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Shar-E Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Hukum Syariah
Published
2025-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37567/shar-e.v11i1.3683
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quo Vadis Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Setelah Amar Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 168/PUU-XXI/2023

Kurniadi Prasetyo
Shar-E Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Hukum Syariah
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

Quo Vadis Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Setelah Amar Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 168/PUU-XXI/2023

Kurniadi Prasetyo
article en

Abstract

After the Constitutional Court (MK) published Decision Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023, which was read aloud in an open plenary session of the Constitutional Court on October 31, 2024, employment law standards underwent changes. The court stressed that employers and employees must engage in bipartite discussions through debate to reach an agreement if workers/laborers reject Termination of Employment (PHK). Additionally, the layoff can only be carried out following a decision from an industrial relations dispute resolution body whose ruling has permanent legal force (inkracht) if bipartite negotiations fail to result in an agreement. With a focus on the inventory of positive law, legal doctrine, and principles, this study employs a normative legal method. Employers must therefore take into account the following dynamics: employers are not allowed to implement layoffs until they have received a decision from an industrial relations dispute resolution body that has permanent legal force, and every worker rejection of layoffs must be preceded by bipartite negotiations through deliberation to reach consensus.

Shar-E Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Hukum SyariahVol. 11(1)
Universitas Yos Soedarso (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quo Vadis Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Setelah Amar Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 168/PUU-XXI/2023 — Kurniadi Prasetyo · Shar-E Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Hukum Syariah (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS