ICESat‐2 Observations of Blowing Snow Over Arctic Sea Ice During the 2019–2020 MOSAiC Expedition

Abstract Blowing snow plays a key role in the surface mass and energy budgets of polar regions and can be a significant source of water vapor to the atmosphere. In this study, we optimize the algorithm for detecting blowing snow from NASA's Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite 2 (ICESat‐2) satellite for use over Arctic sea ice. We analyze six months (November 2019 through April 2020) of observations from the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) campaign together with 612 nearly coincident (within 100 km) ICESat‐2 overpasses to evaluate the ICESat‐2 detection algorithm and inferred blowing snow properties. Both ICESat‐2 and MOSAiC suggest a blowing snow occurrence frequency of 17% during the period of study. Blowing snow particle number and inferred from ICESat‐2 show broad agreement with in situ observations made at 10 m above the surface during MOSAiC but are often well below observations made at 8 cm. Within a 100 km radius around the MOSAiC observatory, we find a cumulative blowing snow sublimation of 2.38 cm snow‐water‐equivalent (SWE), comparable to MOSAiC (2.56 cm SWE) and SnowModel‐LG (2.35 cm SWE) estimates. This suggests that blowing snow sublimation removed 22%–33% of snowfall during MOSAiC. Across the central Arctic, ICESat‐2 and SnowModel‐LG indicate blowing snow occurrence frequencies as high as 18%–25%, with cumulative blowing snow sublimation fluxes (1.74–1.79 cm SWE) removing 16%–17% of snowfall. These findings highlight the importance of blowing snow sublimation for the Arctic snow on sea ice budget.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2025-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jd043919
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ICESat‐2 Observations of Blowing Snow Over Arctic Sea Ice During the 2019–2020 MOSAiC Expedition

M. M. Frey, Glen E. Liston, Joseph A. Robinson, Lyatt Jaeglé et al.
1 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
1.30
article

ICESat‐2 Observations of Blowing Snow Over Arctic Sea Ice During the 2019–2020 MOSAiC Expedition

M. M. Frey, Glen E. Liston, Joseph A. Robinson, Lyatt Jaeglé, Stephen P. Palm, Matthew D. Shupe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Blowing snow plays a key role in the surface mass and energy budgets of polar regions and can be a significant source of water vapor to the atmosphere. In this study, we optimize the algorithm for detecting blowing snow from NASA's Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite 2 (ICESat‐2) satellite for use over Arctic sea ice. We analyze six months (November 2019 through April 2020) of observations from the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) campaign together with 612 nearly coincident (within 100 km) ICESat‐2 overpasses to evaluate the ICESat‐2 detection algorithm and inferred blowing snow properties. Both ICESat‐2 and MOSAiC suggest a blowing snow occurrence frequency of 17% during the period of study. Blowing snow particle number and inferred from ICESat‐2 show broad agreement with in situ observations made at 10 m above the surface during MOSAiC but are often well below observations made at 8 cm. Within a 100 km radius around the MOSAiC observatory, we find a cumulative blowing snow sublimation of 2.38 cm snow‐water‐equivalent (SWE), comparable to MOSAiC (2.56 cm SWE) and SnowModel‐LG (2.35 cm SWE) estimates. This suggests that blowing snow sublimation removed 22%–33% of snowfall during MOSAiC. Across the central Arctic, ICESat‐2 and SnowModel‐LG indicate blowing snow occurrence frequencies as high as 18%–25%, with cumulative blowing snow sublimation fluxes (1.74–1.79 cm SWE) removing 16%–17% of snowfall. These findings highlight the importance of blowing snow sublimation for the Arctic snow on sea ice budget.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 130(16)
Goddard Space Flight Center (US), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US), Natural Environment Research Council (GB), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), University of Washington (US), NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory (US), Science Systems and Applications (United States) (US), Colorado State University (US)
Office of Nuclear Energy, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.