Are “Clean” Days Really Clean? Single Particle Elemental Signatures of PM <sub>2.5</sub> Unveil Their Pulmonary Health Risks

Ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations inadequately reflect health risks due to compositional heterogeneity. This study utilized single-particle inductively coupled plasma time-of-flight mass spectrometry (spICP-TOF-MS) to characterize high-resolution elemental signatures of metal-containing fine particles (MCFPs) in PM<sub>2.5</sub> from an urban area with an intensive anthropogenic influence during different pollution levels in the winter and spring. Al-, Si-, Fe-, Mn-, and Pb-containing FPs accounted for approximately 80% of total MCFPs, with higher number concentrations in spring than in winter, increasing with pollution levels. Unlike Al- and Si-containing FPs, Fe-containing FPs were predominantly multimetal (mm)-FPs (48-87%), with higher proportions in winter than spring and increasing with pollution levels. Notably, a larger fraction of mmFPs, particularly Fe-rich FPs, were associated with toxic metals (e.g., Mn and Pb) on clean days than on polluted days. Lung cytotoxic potencies, including oxidative stress and cytotoxicity, were up to 8.1 and 6.3 times greater on clean days than on polluted days. Fe-rich FPs and their associated toxic metals were identified as first-tier factors in regulating cytotoxic potency, playing a more critical role than organic/elemental carbon and dissolved metals. Machine learning-based source apportionment indicated that anthropogenic-sourced MCFPs, especially Fe-rich FPs, contributed more during winter than in spring, with peak contributions on clean days.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment & Health
Published
2025-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/envhealth.5c00157
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are “Clean” Days Really Clean? Single Particle Elemental Signatures of PM 2.5 Unveil Their Pulmonary Health Risks

Miao Xu, Xinran Ma, Mengyuan Wang, Songda Li et al.
4 citations
Environment & Health
Air Quality and Health Impacts
4.80
article

Are “Clean” Days Really Clean? Single Particle Elemental Signatures of PM 2.5 Unveil Their Pulmonary Health Risks

Miao Xu, Xinran Ma, Mengyuan Wang, Songda Li, Zuoshun Niu, Yi Yang, Bo Peng, Yunqi Zhang, Zhiyan Wang, Hui Zhao, Xiaojing Yang, Zhiqiang Shi
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations inadequately reflect health risks due to compositional heterogeneity. This study utilized single-particle inductively coupled plasma time-of-flight mass spectrometry (spICP-TOF-MS) to characterize high-resolution elemental signatures of metal-containing fine particles (MCFPs) in PM<sub>2.5</sub> from an urban area with an intensive anthropogenic influence during different pollution levels in the winter and spring. Al-, Si-, Fe-, Mn-, and Pb-containing FPs accounted for approximately 80% of total MCFPs, with higher number concentrations in spring than in winter, increasing with pollution levels. Unlike Al- and Si-containing FPs, Fe-containing FPs were predominantly multimetal (mm)-FPs (48-87%), with higher proportions in winter than spring and increasing with pollution levels. Notably, a larger fraction of mmFPs, particularly Fe-rich FPs, were associated with toxic metals (e.g., Mn and Pb) on clean days than on polluted days. Lung cytotoxic potencies, including oxidative stress and cytotoxicity, were up to 8.1 and 6.3 times greater on clean days than on polluted days. Fe-rich FPs and their associated toxic metals were identified as first-tier factors in regulating cytotoxic potency, playing a more critical role than organic/elemental carbon and dissolved metals. Machine learning-based source apportionment indicated that anthropogenic-sourced MCFPs, especially Fe-rich FPs, contributed more during winter than in spring, with peak contributions on clean days.

Environment & HealthVol. 3(11)
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Trustworthy Computing (CN), Shanghai Estuarine & Coastal Science Research Center (CN), Institute of Biomedical Science (GB), State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, East China Normal University, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
4.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.