Effects of Heterogeneous Versus Homogeneous Grouping on English Learners’ Language and Literacy Development: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial

In this preregistered within-teacher randomized controlled trial (n = 84), we tested the effects of grouping English learners (ELs) in homogeneous groups (all ELs) versus heterogeneous groups (ELs and non-ELs) on language, reading comprehension, and argumentative writing. Findings indicated no significant main effects of grouping. However, preregistered moderation analyses indicated that heterogeneous groups benefited students with higher English language skills (Hedges’ g = 0.27–0.59 or 0.75–1.93 grade equivalents), whereas homogeneous groups benefited students with lower English skills ( g = 0.31–0.58 or 1.00–1.55 grade equivalents). Instructional observations indicated that teachers provided more specialized strategies for ELs in homogeneous groups and more authentic questions for students in heterogeneous groups. Findings question the default use of homogeneous grouping and support considering English proficiency when making instructional and policy decisions for EL instruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Educational Research Journal
Published
2025-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312251355989
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Heterogeneous Versus Homogeneous Grouping on English Learners’ Language and Literacy Development: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial

Qun Yu, Michael J. Kieffer, Xiaoying Wu, Rebecca D. Silverman et al.
5 citations
American Educational Research Journal
Reading and Literacy Development
17.22
article

Effects of Heterogeneous Versus Homogeneous Grouping on English Learners’ Language and Literacy Development: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial

Qun Yu, Michael J. Kieffer, Xiaoying Wu, Rebecca D. Silverman, C. Patrick Proctor, S. Austin Cavanaugh, Andrew Weaver, Elise Cappella, Aaron Coleman, Qihan Chen, Sasha Karbachinskiy, Gabriella Solano
article en
5 citations

Abstract

In this preregistered within-teacher randomized controlled trial (n = 84), we tested the effects of grouping English learners (ELs) in homogeneous groups (all ELs) versus heterogeneous groups (ELs and non-ELs) on language, reading comprehension, and argumentative writing. Findings indicated no significant main effects of grouping. However, preregistered moderation analyses indicated that heterogeneous groups benefited students with higher English language skills (Hedges’ g = 0.27–0.59 or 0.75–1.93 grade equivalents), whereas homogeneous groups benefited students with lower English skills ( g = 0.31–0.58 or 1.00–1.55 grade equivalents). Instructional observations indicated that teachers provided more specialized strategies for ELs in homogeneous groups and more authentic questions for students in heterogeneous groups. Findings question the default use of homogeneous grouping and support considering English proficiency when making instructional and policy decisions for EL instruction.

American Educational Research JournalVol. 62(5)
Boston College (US), New York University (US), Stanford University (US)
Institute of Education Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Reading and Literacy Development
17.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.