A comparative evaluation of publicly available large language models in the assessment of CTG traces according to the FIGO criteria

LLMs show major limitations in the interpretation of CTG traces according to the FIGO criteria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Published
2025-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-08145-w
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative evaluation of publicly available large language models in the assessment of CTG traces according to the FIGO criteria

O. Lapaire, Valeria Filippi, Cécile Monod, Iason Psilopatis et al.
5 citations
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
17.47
article

A comparative evaluation of publicly available large language models in the assessment of CTG traces according to the FIGO criteria

O. Lapaire, Valeria Filippi, Cécile Monod, Iason Psilopatis, Beatrice Mosimann, Tibor A. Zwimpfer, Julius Emons, Rebecca Tschudin
article en
5 citations

Abstract

LLMs show major limitations in the interpretation of CTG traces according to the FIGO criteria.

Archives of Gynecology and ObstetricsVol. 312(5)
University of Basel (CH), University Hospital of Basel (CH), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen (DE)
Universität Basel
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
17.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.