Structural and functional vascular changes and exercise tolerance at the long-term follow-up after COVID‑19

Background . Endothelial dysfunction is considered one of the possible pathophysiologic mechanisms of decreased exercise tolerance in patients after COVID‑19. Objective . To evaluate the structural and functional vascular changes and exercise tolerance in patients at the long-term follow-up after hospitalization for COVID‑19. Design and methods . Patients older than 18 years of age from the epidemiological ESSE-RF study were examined: COVID‑19 group (n = 31) — patients hospitalized due to COVID‑19; control group (n = 31) — patients not hospitalized due to COVID‑19. Endothelial state was assessed by levels of von Willebrand factor (vWF), interleukin 6 (IL‑6), and trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO); arterial stiffness was assessed by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and by cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI); exercise tolerance was evaluated by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Results . The patients were examined at 570 ± 179 days after hospitalization for COVID‑19. There were no differences in vascular parameters between the COVID‑19 group and the control group (p > 0,05): vWF — 2,2 (0,5; 2,7) vs. 2,3 (1,0; 2,9) U/mL, IL‑6–1,5 (1,0; 3,1) vs. 1,6 (1,0; 3,5) pg/mL, TMAO — 1023,9 (712,7; 1284,7) vs. 896,9 (731,0; 1061,1) pg/mL, cfPWV — 8,4 (7,1; 9,5) vs. 8,2±1,1 m/s, CAVI — 8,0 ± 1,1 vs. 8,2 ± 1,1; as for the results of the CPET: VO2peak — 86,0 (81,0; 92,7) % predicted vs. 86,0 (81,0; 91,5) % predicted, VE/VCO2peak — 28,7 ± 4,5 vs. 27,6 ± 4,8, breathing reserve — 54,7 ± 10,0 % vs. 58,3 ± 8,1 %. Conclusion . Patients in the long-term period after hospitalization for COVID‑19 show no structural and functional changes or exercise tolerance issues in CPET compared with patients who were not hospitalized for COVID‑19.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arterial’naya Gipertenziya (Arterial Hypertension)
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419x-2025-2511
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural and functional vascular changes and exercise tolerance at the long-term follow-up after COVID‑19

S. A. Bondar, О. P. Rotar, E. V. Moguchaia, А. М. Ерина et al.
Arterial’naya Gipertenziya (Arterial Hypertension)
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
article

Structural and functional vascular changes and exercise tolerance at the long-term follow-up after COVID‑19

S. A. Bondar, О. P. Rotar, E. V. Moguchaia, А. М. Ерина, А. В. Березина, А. О. Конради, Т. Л. Каронова, M. Boyarinova, Е. Yu. Vasilyeva, Е. П. Колесова
article en

Abstract

Background . Endothelial dysfunction is considered one of the possible pathophysiologic mechanisms of decreased exercise tolerance in patients after COVID‑19. Objective . To evaluate the structural and functional vascular changes and exercise tolerance in patients at the long-term follow-up after hospitalization for COVID‑19. Design and methods . Patients older than 18 years of age from the epidemiological ESSE-RF study were examined: COVID‑19 group (n = 31) — patients hospitalized due to COVID‑19; control group (n = 31) — patients not hospitalized due to COVID‑19. Endothelial state was assessed by levels of von Willebrand factor (vWF), interleukin 6 (IL‑6), and trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO); arterial stiffness was assessed by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and by cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI); exercise tolerance was evaluated by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Results . The patients were examined at 570 ± 179 days after hospitalization for COVID‑19. There were no differences in vascular parameters between the COVID‑19 group and the control group (p > 0,05): vWF — 2,2 (0,5; 2,7) vs. 2,3 (1,0; 2,9) U/mL, IL‑6–1,5 (1,0; 3,1) vs. 1,6 (1,0; 3,5) pg/mL, TMAO — 1023,9 (712,7; 1284,7) vs. 896,9 (731,0; 1061,1) pg/mL, cfPWV — 8,4 (7,1; 9,5) vs. 8,2±1,1 m/s, CAVI — 8,0 ± 1,1 vs. 8,2 ± 1,1; as for the results of the CPET: VO2peak — 86,0 (81,0; 92,7) % predicted vs. 86,0 (81,0; 91,5) % predicted, VE/VCO2peak — 28,7 ± 4,5 vs. 27,6 ± 4,8, breathing reserve — 54,7 ± 10,0 % vs. 58,3 ± 8,1 %. Conclusion . Patients in the long-term period after hospitalization for COVID‑19 show no structural and functional changes or exercise tolerance issues in CPET compared with patients who were not hospitalized for COVID‑19.

Arterial’naya Gipertenziya (Arterial Hypertension)Vol. 31(3)
Federal Almazov North-West Medical Research Centre (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.