Development of a MASH TL-4 Open Concrete Bridge Rail

A new open concrete bridge rail was developed to satisfy the safety performance criteria of AASHTO’s (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Official’s) Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) Test Level 4 (TL-4). The railing design was optimized to minimize vehicle snag, contain large openings for drainage and aesthetics, minimize installation costs, and have the capacity to withstand MASH TL-4 impacts. Additionally, the railing was designed to be crashworthy before and after roadway overlays up to 3 in. thick. The new barrier was designed with a height of 39 in. and a width of 14 in. Posts were 36 in. long, by 10 in. deep, by 12 in. tall, and were set back 4 in. from the face of the railing to minimize the risk of vehicle snag. The inelastic post-and-beam method found in Section 13 of AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications was modified to account for differences in failure shapes between steel and concrete post and beam railings. The modified method also adjusted the height for the applied design load to match the recommended 30 in. height for tall TL-4 barriers. This modified analysis method was used to optimize the barrier geometry and reinforcement. The new open concrete bridge rail was then subjected to crash testing in accordance with MASH TL-4. All three tests, MASH Tests 4-10, 4-11, and 4-12, resulted in successful capture and safe redirection of the vehicles. Thus, the new open concrete bridge railing was deemed MASH TL-4 crashworthy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2025-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981251349441
Primary Topic
Engineering Applied Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a MASH TL-4 Open Concrete Bridge Rail

Scott K. Rosenbaugh, Robert W. Bielenberg, Ronald K. Faller
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Engineering Applied Research
article

Development of a MASH TL-4 Open Concrete Bridge Rail

Scott K. Rosenbaugh, Robert W. Bielenberg, Ronald K. Faller
article en

Abstract

A new open concrete bridge rail was developed to satisfy the safety performance criteria of AASHTO’s (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Official’s) Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) Test Level 4 (TL-4). The railing design was optimized to minimize vehicle snag, contain large openings for drainage and aesthetics, minimize installation costs, and have the capacity to withstand MASH TL-4 impacts. Additionally, the railing was designed to be crashworthy before and after roadway overlays up to 3 in. thick. The new barrier was designed with a height of 39 in. and a width of 14 in. Posts were 36 in. long, by 10 in. deep, by 12 in. tall, and were set back 4 in. from the face of the railing to minimize the risk of vehicle snag. The inelastic post-and-beam method found in Section 13 of AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications was modified to account for differences in failure shapes between steel and concrete post and beam railings. The modified method also adjusted the height for the applied design load to match the recommended 30 in. height for tall TL-4 barriers. This modified analysis method was used to optimize the barrier geometry and reinforcement. The new open concrete bridge rail was then subjected to crash testing in accordance with MASH TL-4. All three tests, MASH Tests 4-10, 4-11, and 4-12, resulted in successful capture and safe redirection of the vehicles. Thus, the new open concrete bridge railing was deemed MASH TL-4 crashworthy.

Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardVol. 2680(3)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
South Dakota Department of Transportation, Virginia Department of Transportation, Iowa Department of Transportation, Kansas Department of Transportation, Nebraska Department of Transportation
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Engineering Applied Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.