Legislating Trauma: Book Bans, Educational Gag Orders, and Microaggressions

ABSTRACT As the number of book bans continues to increase nationally, there has been a growing body of research examining the impacts of book bans and their function as an extension of other educational gag orders. The literature is profusely and unapologetically clear that book bans have a myriad of impacts—they decrease engagement, critical thinking and literacies, and student and teacher morale, as well as lead to a lower sense of self. In this conceptual paper, I build on this body of scholarship particularly in terms of considering the impact of book bans on safety, belonging, and especially well‐being. Specifically, I ground this paper in Critical Race Theory and trauma‐informed studies to show that reading bans constitute a microaggression and can cause trauma for minoritized students. Therefore, we must understand reading bans not only as a censoring of literacy but also as a censoring of certain people's right to exist and to be well. In other words, book bans are not simply an attack on texts but an attack on marginalized people's lives—one that is being legislated at local, state, and federal levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reading Research Quarterly
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.70046
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Education Discipline and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
44.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legislating Trauma: Book Bans, Educational Gag Orders, and Microaggressions

Sharim Hannegan‐Martinez
5 citations
Reading Research Quarterly
Education Discipline and Inequality
44.63
article

Legislating Trauma: Book Bans, Educational Gag Orders, and Microaggressions

Sharim Hannegan‐Martinez
article en
5 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT As the number of book bans continues to increase nationally, there has been a growing body of research examining the impacts of book bans and their function as an extension of other educational gag orders. The literature is profusely and unapologetically clear that book bans have a myriad of impacts—they decrease engagement, critical thinking and literacies, and student and teacher morale, as well as lead to a lower sense of self. In this conceptual paper, I build on this body of scholarship particularly in terms of considering the impact of book bans on safety, belonging, and especially well‐being. Specifically, I ground this paper in Critical Race Theory and trauma‐informed studies to show that reading bans constitute a microaggression and can cause trauma for minoritized students. Therefore, we must understand reading bans not only as a censoring of literacy but also as a censoring of certain people's right to exist and to be well. In other words, book bans are not simply an attack on texts but an attack on marginalized people's lives—one that is being legislated at local, state, and federal levels.

Reading Research QuarterlyVol. 60(4)
University of Michigan (US), Michigan United (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Education Discipline and Inequality
44.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.