A Better Road to Recovery- Effectiveness of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Compared to Conventional Methods on Post-Concussion Patients

Background: Concussion, a form of traumatic brain injury, often presents with sleep disturbances, headache, confusion, and memory impairment. Current treatment includes reduced screen time, physical activity, and increased rest. For decades, these treatment options have demonstrated improvement in symptoms. Recently, there is growing interest in whether using osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) to target structural dysfunctions is more effective. This review compares OMT to conventional treatment methods in post-concussion patients. Methods: This literature review uses data from clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and case reports within the past 10-15 years. It includes adolescents, adults, elderly, athletes, and non-athletes while excluding data involving non-human/animal studies. The comparison takes into account symptom reduction, recovery time, and quality of life. Results: Compared to conventional treatment, OMT shows a statistically significant improvement (p-value Conclusion: Overall, OMT shows promising results in treating concussion patients. However, further research using a larger sample size, standardized treatments, and long-term follow-ups is needed to better understand the effectiveness of OMT compared to conventional treatment in post-concussion patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31986/issn.2689-0690_rdw.stratford_research_day.184_2025
Primary Topic
Medical and Biological Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Better Road to Recovery- Effectiveness of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Compared to Conventional Methods on Post-Concussion Patients

Joliana H. Eskandar
Medical and Biological Sciences
article

A Better Road to Recovery- Effectiveness of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Compared to Conventional Methods on Post-Concussion Patients

Joliana H. Eskandar
article en

Abstract

Background: Concussion, a form of traumatic brain injury, often presents with sleep disturbances, headache, confusion, and memory impairment. Current treatment includes reduced screen time, physical activity, and increased rest. For decades, these treatment options have demonstrated improvement in symptoms. Recently, there is growing interest in whether using osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) to target structural dysfunctions is more effective. This review compares OMT to conventional treatment methods in post-concussion patients. Methods: This literature review uses data from clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and case reports within the past 10-15 years. It includes adolescents, adults, elderly, athletes, and non-athletes while excluding data involving non-human/animal studies. The comparison takes into account symptom reduction, recovery time, and quality of life. Results: Compared to conventional treatment, OMT shows a statistically significant improvement (p-value Conclusion: Overall, OMT shows promising results in treating concussion patients. However, further research using a larger sample size, standardized treatments, and long-term follow-ups is needed to better understand the effectiveness of OMT compared to conventional treatment in post-concussion patients.

Rowan University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Medical and Biological Sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.