El Fraude Procesal y los Peritos Forenses

Procedural fraud is an unlawful act that involves deceiving the judicial authority to obtain an undue benefit in civil, criminal, or administrative proceedings. This crime can be committed by any person, including experts (peritos), who are technical assistants to the administration of justice called upon to issue specialized reports. The offense is established when the judge is misled through the concealment or manipulation of evidence, with the intention of influencing a judicial decision. The Comprehensive Organic Criminal Code stipulates that for procedural fraud to exist, elements such as intentional conduct, typicity, unlawfulness, and culpability must be present; it punishes with imprisonment those who commit these actions or collaborate with the perpetrators. Expert reports must meet minimum requirements, including identification of the expert, methodology used, detailed analysis, and clear conclusions supported by technical and scientific evidence. These reports are fundamental for the proper evaluation by the judge and must be prepared with objectivity, independence, and truthfulness. In cases where an expert is investigated for procedural fraud, they must act promptly, demonstrate that they acted in good faith, complied with legal and technical requirements in their reports; provide exculpatory evidence, maintain consistency in their version, and request the participation of the judge as a passive subject of the crime to clarify whether deception actually occurred. Specialized technical defense is key to refuting responsibility and ensuring respect for the presumption of innocence; these basic inputs are what we will explore in the present analysis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ibero Ciencias - Revista Científica y Académica - ISSN 3072-7197
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63371/ic.v4.n3.a181
Primary Topic
Legal processes and jurisprudence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

El Fraude Procesal y los Peritos Forenses

Juan Pablo Matute-Calle
Ibero Ciencias - Revista Científica y Académica - ISSN 3072-7197
Legal processes and jurisprudence
article

El Fraude Procesal y los Peritos Forenses

Juan Pablo Matute-Calle
article en

Abstract

Procedural fraud is an unlawful act that involves deceiving the judicial authority to obtain an undue benefit in civil, criminal, or administrative proceedings. This crime can be committed by any person, including experts (peritos), who are technical assistants to the administration of justice called upon to issue specialized reports. The offense is established when the judge is misled through the concealment or manipulation of evidence, with the intention of influencing a judicial decision. The Comprehensive Organic Criminal Code stipulates that for procedural fraud to exist, elements such as intentional conduct, typicity, unlawfulness, and culpability must be present; it punishes with imprisonment those who commit these actions or collaborate with the perpetrators. Expert reports must meet minimum requirements, including identification of the expert, methodology used, detailed analysis, and clear conclusions supported by technical and scientific evidence. These reports are fundamental for the proper evaluation by the judge and must be prepared with objectivity, independence, and truthfulness. In cases where an expert is investigated for procedural fraud, they must act promptly, demonstrate that they acted in good faith, complied with legal and technical requirements in their reports; provide exculpatory evidence, maintain consistency in their version, and request the participation of the judge as a passive subject of the crime to clarify whether deception actually occurred. Specialized technical defense is key to refuting responsibility and ensuring respect for the presumption of innocence; these basic inputs are what we will explore in the present analysis.

Ibero Ciencias - Revista Científica y Académica - ISSN 3072-7197Vol. 4(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Legal processes and jurisprudence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.