Experimental characterisation of hydraulic lime mortar and clay brick elasticity using the Virtual Fields Method

Digital image correlation (DIC) offers the ability to calculate strain fields on the surfaces of test samples. This data can be used to characterise the mechanical properties of construction materials during compression tests. In this paper, a practical inverse technique called Virtual Fields Method (VFM) is customised for the characterisation of elastic properties (Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio) of construction materials during compression tests. More specifically, hydraulic lime mortar and solid clay brick materials, which are commonly found in both historic and modern structures, are examined. When applied to slender rectangular prisms away from contacts, VFM and extensometer-based characterisation demonstrate excellent agreement, with average deviation less than 5%. However, VFM characterises elasticity more comprehensively and robustly than standard extensometer-based methods. To account for through-thickness strain variations due to contact force eccentricities, VFM identification results from opposing faces of the sample are averaged. Furthermore, local surface defects are identified with the equilibrium gap indicator and excluded via virtual field constraints to achieve unbiased characterisations. The accuracy of the characterisation is evaluated by reconstructing the applied forces on sample cross sections and comparing these to the measured forces. This workflow is applied when VFM is used to characterise elasticity during splitting tests on flattened brick cores. Here, VFM yields results that deviate on average by only ∼ 10% from analytical estimates, even though it does not rely on predefined analytical expressions. This example illustrates the ability of VFM to identify material properties under complex stress states, opening up new possibilities for improved characterisation of construction materials. This can be particularly useful for identifying the properties of materials from non-standard samples extracted from historic buildings. • Applied VFM to identify elastic properties of brick and mortar in compression. • Mortar prisms: <5 % difference between VFM and extensometer Young’s modulus. • Brick prisms: ∼ 10 % diff. between VFM and extensom. results for bricks with defects. • VFM on brick cores shows robustness under non-uniform stress distributions. • Equilibrium gap detects defects, enabling unbiased material characterisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Construction and Building Materials
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.143076
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental characterisation of hydraulic lime mortar and clay brick elasticity using the Virtual Fields Method

Sinan Acikgoz, Marialuigia Sangirardi, Bora Pulatsu, R. Wilson et al.
Construction and Building Materials
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
article

Experimental characterisation of hydraulic lime mortar and clay brick elasticity using the Virtual Fields Method

Sinan Acikgoz, Marialuigia Sangirardi, Bora Pulatsu, R. Wilson, Miles R. W. Judd
article en

Abstract

Digital image correlation (DIC) offers the ability to calculate strain fields on the surfaces of test samples. This data can be used to characterise the mechanical properties of construction materials during compression tests. In this paper, a practical inverse technique called Virtual Fields Method (VFM) is customised for the characterisation of elastic properties (Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio) of construction materials during compression tests. More specifically, hydraulic lime mortar and solid clay brick materials, which are commonly found in both historic and modern structures, are examined. When applied to slender rectangular prisms away from contacts, VFM and extensometer-based characterisation demonstrate excellent agreement, with average deviation less than 5%. However, VFM characterises elasticity more comprehensively and robustly than standard extensometer-based methods. To account for through-thickness strain variations due to contact force eccentricities, VFM identification results from opposing faces of the sample are averaged. Furthermore, local surface defects are identified with the equilibrium gap indicator and excluded via virtual field constraints to achieve unbiased characterisations. The accuracy of the characterisation is evaluated by reconstructing the applied forces on sample cross sections and comparing these to the measured forces. This workflow is applied when VFM is used to characterise elasticity during splitting tests on flattened brick cores. Here, VFM yields results that deviate on average by only ∼ 10% from analytical estimates, even though it does not rely on predefined analytical expressions. This example illustrates the ability of VFM to identify material properties under complex stress states, opening up new possibilities for improved characterisation of construction materials. This can be particularly useful for identifying the properties of materials from non-standard samples extracted from historic buildings. • Applied VFM to identify elastic properties of brick and mortar in compression. • Mortar prisms: <5 % difference between VFM and extensometer Young’s modulus. • Brick prisms: ∼ 10 % diff. between VFM and extensom. results for bricks with defects. • VFM on brick cores shows robustness under non-uniform stress distributions. • Equilibrium gap detects defects, enabling unbiased material characterisation.

Construction and Building MaterialsVol. 493
University of Oxford (GB), Carleton University (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.