KANTIAN VIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS: SOME OBSERVATIONS

Environmental ethics explores the ethical relationship between humans and the natural world. It argues for the necessity of a well-structured environmental ethic to guide our moral responsibilities towards nature, highlighting the importance of public discourse in shaping actions that impact the environment. A Kantian perspective on the environment suggests that our understanding and ethical obligations toward the natural world are inherently holistic. It posits that nature should not be viewed merely as an instrument for human benefit but as a complex system that we are morally obliged to preserve. Kant’s theories of teleological judgment and moral autonomy, contend that our duty to protect nature extends to safeguarding ecosystems as integral wholes, thereby ensuring their dynamic diversity and integrity. Ultimately, this piece asserts that our ethical approach to the environment must encompass a holistic view, recognizing our interconnectedness with the natural world and the moral imperatives that arise from it. This paper also evaluates the adequacy of Kant’s ethical theory in addressing our responsibilities towards nonhuman animals and the environment. Kantian ethics differentiates between person rational beings with intrinsic value regarded as ends in themselves and things, which possess only relative worth. Regarding the broader context of nature and nonrational beings, Kant asserts that our obligations toward them are only indirect or contingent. Some philosophers critique Kant’s ethical framework as being anthropocentric, leading to speciesist conclusions. This paper argues that these indirect duties can align with the interests of nonhumans, encompassing concerns like the suffering of nonhuman animals and the preservation of species and ecosystems. Therefore, Kant’s moral philosophy can contribute to environmental ethics by providing a foundation for animal welfare and environmental protections, serving as limits on unrestrained human behaviour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy and the Life-world
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62424/jplw.2025.27.00.14
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Geoengineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

KANTIAN VIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS: SOME OBSERVATIONS

Pankoj Kanti Sarkar
Philosophy and the Life-world
Climate Change and Geoengineering
article

KANTIAN VIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS: SOME OBSERVATIONS

Pankoj Kanti Sarkar
article en

Abstract

Environmental ethics explores the ethical relationship between humans and the natural world. It argues for the necessity of a well-structured environmental ethic to guide our moral responsibilities towards nature, highlighting the importance of public discourse in shaping actions that impact the environment. A Kantian perspective on the environment suggests that our understanding and ethical obligations toward the natural world are inherently holistic. It posits that nature should not be viewed merely as an instrument for human benefit but as a complex system that we are morally obliged to preserve. Kant’s theories of teleological judgment and moral autonomy, contend that our duty to protect nature extends to safeguarding ecosystems as integral wholes, thereby ensuring their dynamic diversity and integrity. Ultimately, this piece asserts that our ethical approach to the environment must encompass a holistic view, recognizing our interconnectedness with the natural world and the moral imperatives that arise from it. This paper also evaluates the adequacy of Kant’s ethical theory in addressing our responsibilities towards nonhuman animals and the environment. Kantian ethics differentiates between person rational beings with intrinsic value regarded as ends in themselves and things, which possess only relative worth. Regarding the broader context of nature and nonrational beings, Kant asserts that our obligations toward them are only indirect or contingent. Some philosophers critique Kant’s ethical framework as being anthropocentric, leading to speciesist conclusions. This paper argues that these indirect duties can align with the interests of nonhumans, encompassing concerns like the suffering of nonhuman animals and the preservation of species and ecosystems. Therefore, Kant’s moral philosophy can contribute to environmental ethics by providing a foundation for animal welfare and environmental protections, serving as limits on unrestrained human behaviour.

Philosophy and the Life-worldVol. 27(00)
Sanskriti Samvardhan Mandal (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Climate Change and Geoengineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

KANTIAN VIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS: SOME OBSERVATIONS — Pankoj Kanti Sarkar · Philosophy and the Life-world (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS