Hartmann's Critique of Kant’s Ethics and Its Enduring Relevance

The depth and profundity of Kant's ethical thinking did not escape the notice of subsequent moral philosophers. Among others, in recent times, phenomenological ethicists have sharply responded to Kant's ethical ideas, which have exercised a powerful and pervasive influence over the centuries down to the present era. Nicolai Hartmann is one such thinker who has duly recognized some aspects of importance in Kantian ethics, though he is highly critical of other aspects of his ethical thinking. Hartmann has devoted a section of his book ‘Ethics’ to critically appraise Kant's ethics. This research paper proposes to delineate, explicate, and reflect on Hartmann's criticism of Kant's ethical framework under three different sections, viz., (i) Subjectivism in Kant (ii) Formalism in Kant, and (iii) Intellectualism in Kant. By emphasizing the significance of intuitive insights, substantive values, and context-sensitive moral judgments, Hartmann's critique offers a more refined understanding of moral experience. This research also provides a framework for addressing complex moral dilemmas and challenges Kant’s rigid moral absolutism. Through a detailed analysis of both philosophers’ work, this study contributes to ongoing discussions in moral philosophy, exploring the delicate balance between universality and particularity in ethical thought and its implication for modern moral inquiry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy and the Life-world
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62424/jplw.2025.27.00.08
Primary Topic
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hartmann's Critique of Kant’s Ethics and Its Enduring Relevance

Venugopal Nair
Philosophy and the Life-world
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
article

Hartmann's Critique of Kant’s Ethics and Its Enduring Relevance

Venugopal Nair
article en

Abstract

The depth and profundity of Kant's ethical thinking did not escape the notice of subsequent moral philosophers. Among others, in recent times, phenomenological ethicists have sharply responded to Kant's ethical ideas, which have exercised a powerful and pervasive influence over the centuries down to the present era. Nicolai Hartmann is one such thinker who has duly recognized some aspects of importance in Kantian ethics, though he is highly critical of other aspects of his ethical thinking. Hartmann has devoted a section of his book ‘Ethics’ to critically appraise Kant's ethics. This research paper proposes to delineate, explicate, and reflect on Hartmann's criticism of Kant's ethical framework under three different sections, viz., (i) Subjectivism in Kant (ii) Formalism in Kant, and (iii) Intellectualism in Kant. By emphasizing the significance of intuitive insights, substantive values, and context-sensitive moral judgments, Hartmann's critique offers a more refined understanding of moral experience. This research also provides a framework for addressing complex moral dilemmas and challenges Kant’s rigid moral absolutism. Through a detailed analysis of both philosophers’ work, this study contributes to ongoing discussions in moral philosophy, exploring the delicate balance between universality and particularity in ethical thought and its implication for modern moral inquiry.

Philosophy and the Life-worldVol. 27(00)
University of Rajasthan (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.