Measuring high-priority outcomes in a real-world sample of autistic adults: cohort development, data collection, and sample description for the AASPIRE Outcomes Project

Adult autism services research is plagued by methodological challenges, including 1) lack of accessible self-reported outcome measures, 2) difficulty obtaining representative or heterogeneous samples, and 3) a frequent mismatch between experimental methodologies and real-world settings. The AASPIRE Outcomes Project uses a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to 1) create a set of self- and caregiver-reported outcome measures to evaluate health and social services for autistic adults, and 2) explore factors predicting changes in outcomes. We previously used a CBPR-nested Delphi process to identify high-priority outcomes and then adapted or created instruments to measure them. We are conducting a longitudinal survey to validate these measures in a pragmatic sample of autistic adults from two healthcare systems, two disability service systems, and the larger autistic community in the United States. We collected baseline data from 870 participants. Follow-up rates were >80% for the 2nd and 3rd timepoints. The sample includes strong heterogeneity. As expected, sample characteristics differed markedly between the 3 subcohorts. All 22 outcome measures demonstrated excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Lessons from our experience may help other researchers devise strategies to effectively recruit and collect rich data from heterogeneous samples of autistic adults across various settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4m3bf_v1
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring high-priority outcomes in a real-world sample of autistic adults: cohort development, data collection, and sample description for the AASPIRE Outcomes Project

Mirah Scharer, Willi Horner‐Johnson, Clarissa Kripke, Andrea Joyce et al.
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

Measuring high-priority outcomes in a real-world sample of autistic adults: cohort development, data collection, and sample description for the AASPIRE Outcomes Project

Mirah Scharer, Willi Horner‐Johnson, Clarissa Kripke, Andrea Joyce, Julie Lounds Taylor, Joelle Maslak, Ian Moura, Emanuel Frowner, K.E. Flores, Dora Raymaker, Julia Love, Anna “Furra” Wallington, Rachel Kripke-Ludwig, Liu‐Qin Yang, Georgia Herbert, Shannon Des Roches Rosa, Katherine McDonald, Mary J. Baker-Ericzén, Noah K. Kaufman, Christina Nicolaidis, Steven K. Kapp, Zack Siddeek, Joseph Vera, Ivanova Smith, Vince Grillo, Finn Gardiner
article en

Abstract

Adult autism services research is plagued by methodological challenges, including 1) lack of accessible self-reported outcome measures, 2) difficulty obtaining representative or heterogeneous samples, and 3) a frequent mismatch between experimental methodologies and real-world settings. The AASPIRE Outcomes Project uses a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to 1) create a set of self- and caregiver-reported outcome measures to evaluate health and social services for autistic adults, and 2) explore factors predicting changes in outcomes. We previously used a CBPR-nested Delphi process to identify high-priority outcomes and then adapted or created instruments to measure them. We are conducting a longitudinal survey to validate these measures in a pragmatic sample of autistic adults from two healthcare systems, two disability service systems, and the larger autistic community in the United States. We collected baseline data from 870 participants. Follow-up rates were >80% for the 2nd and 3rd timepoints. The sample includes strong heterogeneity. As expected, sample characteristics differed markedly between the 3 subcohorts. All 22 outcome measures demonstrated excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Lessons from our experience may help other researchers devise strategies to effectively recruit and collect rich data from heterogeneous samples of autistic adults across various settings.

National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.