Social Disparities Across Different Stages of Medical Help‐Seeking to Have a Child in Germany

Delayed childbearing has led more individuals and couples to seek medical help for conception in many European countries. In accordance with a stratified reproduction perspective, there is evidence of social disparities concerning who seeks medical help to become pregnant. However, it remains unclear whether and how disparities vary across different stages of the help‐seeking process. This article provides novel evidence on the degree of disparities and associated factors involved in the process of medical help‐seeking to have a child by stage, distinguishing between consulting a doctor, receiving medication, and getting more advanced treatments such as in vitro fertilization. Using wave 1 of the German Family Demographic Panel Study (FReDA), a novel and large data source, we examine women and men aged 18–50 using partial proportional odds models. Women reported a higher lifetime prevalence of help‐seeking (12.3%) than men (8.0%), primarily due to greater use of medication. We found that two of four indicators of social stratification were associated with help‐seeking (income and marital status, but not education and migration background). Women and men with higher household income and those who were married were more likely to seek medical help. Less‐intensive infertility treatment is free, but advanced treatments are expensive, and only married couples are eligible for partial reimbursement. We had therefore expected to find stronger associations for both variables for advanced treatments, which was not the case. This suggests that, even though financial considerations were important, selection into treatment may also be related to other factors, including cultural and knowledge‐based factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Inclusion
Published
2025-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.10420
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Disparities Across Different Stages of Medical Help‐Seeking to Have a Child in Germany

Arthur L. Greil, Martin Bujard, Julia McQuillan, Jasmin Passet-Wittig
1 citations
Social Inclusion
Child Welfare and Adoption
2.37
article

Social Disparities Across Different Stages of Medical Help‐Seeking to Have a Child in Germany

Arthur L. Greil, Martin Bujard, Julia McQuillan, Jasmin Passet-Wittig
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Delayed childbearing has led more individuals and couples to seek medical help for conception in many European countries. In accordance with a stratified reproduction perspective, there is evidence of social disparities concerning who seeks medical help to become pregnant. However, it remains unclear whether and how disparities vary across different stages of the help‐seeking process. This article provides novel evidence on the degree of disparities and associated factors involved in the process of medical help‐seeking to have a child by stage, distinguishing between consulting a doctor, receiving medication, and getting more advanced treatments such as in vitro fertilization. Using wave 1 of the German Family Demographic Panel Study (FReDA), a novel and large data source, we examine women and men aged 18–50 using partial proportional odds models. Women reported a higher lifetime prevalence of help‐seeking (12.3%) than men (8.0%), primarily due to greater use of medication. We found that two of four indicators of social stratification were associated with help‐seeking (income and marital status, but not education and migration background). Women and men with higher household income and those who were married were more likely to seek medical help. Less‐intensive infertility treatment is free, but advanced treatments are expensive, and only married couples are eligible for partial reimbursement. We had therefore expected to find stronger associations for both variables for advanced treatments, which was not the case. This suggests that, even though financial considerations were important, selection into treatment may also be related to other factors, including cultural and knowledge‐based factors.

Social InclusionVol. 13
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), Federal Institute for Population Research (DE), Alfred University (US)
European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Child Welfare and Adoption
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.