<b>Gendered Leadership and Professional Identity in Sindh's Higher Education: Institutional Barriers and Policy Implications</b>

Women in higher education leadership in Pakistan remain markedly underrepresented, particularly in the Sindh province, where patriarchal social structures, feudal cultural norms, and opaque institutional systems severely constrain their leadership trajectories. This qualitative study investigates how women in Sindh’s academic institutions construct their professional identities and navigate barriers to leadership in both urban and rural university contexts. Drawing on Feminist Theory, Social Identity Theory, and the Glass Ceiling and Sticky Floor metaphors, the research explores the lived experiences of women in mid-to-senior academic positions. In-depth narrative interviews reveal five interlocking challenges: gendered institutional cultures that delegitimize female authority, the absence of formal mentoring pathways, resistance from male subordinates, intersectional discrimination affecting women from minority and rural backgrounds, and persistent work-life imbalances unsupported by institutional policies. Despite systemic constraints, women faculty display resilience and agency through adaptive leadership styles, informal mentorship practices, and strategic navigation of institutional norms. Their narratives demonstrate a shift from hierarchical leadership models to relational and transformative practices grounded in empathy, inclusivity, and advocacy. The study contributes to the evolving discourse on gender and leadership in South Asian higher education by providing an empirically grounded, context-specific account of how women resist, reframe, and redefine professional identity under constraint. Policy recommendations include institutional reforms such as gender quotas, mentorship programs, leadership training hubs, and gender-sensitization initiatives. Ultimately, the study calls for a structural overhaul that reimagines academic leadership as an inclusive, participatory domain where women’s contributions are not only visible but institutionally valued.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Stability Archive
Published
2025-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63468/jpsa.3.3.62
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gendered Leadership and Professional Identity in Sindh's Higher Education: Institutional Barriers and Policy Implications

Sher Bano Kaka, Kiran Hashmi
Journal of Political Stability Archive
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Gendered Leadership and Professional Identity in Sindh's Higher Education: Institutional Barriers and Policy Implications

Sher Bano Kaka, Kiran Hashmi
article en

Abstract

Women in higher education leadership in Pakistan remain markedly underrepresented, particularly in the Sindh province, where patriarchal social structures, feudal cultural norms, and opaque institutional systems severely constrain their leadership trajectories. This qualitative study investigates how women in Sindh’s academic institutions construct their professional identities and navigate barriers to leadership in both urban and rural university contexts. Drawing on Feminist Theory, Social Identity Theory, and the Glass Ceiling and Sticky Floor metaphors, the research explores the lived experiences of women in mid-to-senior academic positions. In-depth narrative interviews reveal five interlocking challenges: gendered institutional cultures that delegitimize female authority, the absence of formal mentoring pathways, resistance from male subordinates, intersectional discrimination affecting women from minority and rural backgrounds, and persistent work-life imbalances unsupported by institutional policies. Despite systemic constraints, women faculty display resilience and agency through adaptive leadership styles, informal mentorship practices, and strategic navigation of institutional norms. Their narratives demonstrate a shift from hierarchical leadership models to relational and transformative practices grounded in empathy, inclusivity, and advocacy. The study contributes to the evolving discourse on gender and leadership in South Asian higher education by providing an empirically grounded, context-specific account of how women resist, reframe, and redefine professional identity under constraint. Policy recommendations include institutional reforms such as gender quotas, mentorship programs, leadership training hubs, and gender-sensitization initiatives. Ultimately, the study calls for a structural overhaul that reimagines academic leadership as an inclusive, participatory domain where women’s contributions are not only visible but institutionally valued.

Journal of Political Stability ArchiveVol. 3(3)
Institute of Business Management (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.