The Personal is Political: Assessing the Effects of Personal Narratives on Public Opinion

Can sharing personal experiences with abortion change public attitudes about this issue? Using a preference-incorporating choice and assignment design, we find that personal narrative accounts reach a broader audience and are more persuasive than appeals conveying the same factual information in a more general manner. These effects, however, are concentrated among women who would likely avoid hearing such personal accounts if given the choice, while men’s attitudes appear largely unmoved. Understanding public opinion change on abortion and other morally divisive political issues requires advocates and scholars to account for the extent of public outreach along with the content of the message. Our work provides new evidence to understand how advocacy can best function on social media platforms where choice is prevalent and powerful.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Politics Research
Published
2025-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x251367376
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Personal is Political: Assessing the Effects of Personal Narratives on Public Opinion

Marie Schenk, Kristen Essel, Paul Testa
American Politics Research
Social Media and Politics
article

The Personal is Political: Assessing the Effects of Personal Narratives on Public Opinion

Marie Schenk, Kristen Essel, Paul Testa
article en

Abstract

Can sharing personal experiences with abortion change public attitudes about this issue? Using a preference-incorporating choice and assignment design, we find that personal narrative accounts reach a broader audience and are more persuasive than appeals conveying the same factual information in a more general manner. These effects, however, are concentrated among women who would likely avoid hearing such personal accounts if given the choice, while men’s attitudes appear largely unmoved. Understanding public opinion change on abortion and other morally divisive political issues requires advocates and scholars to account for the extent of public outreach along with the content of the message. Our work provides new evidence to understand how advocacy can best function on social media platforms where choice is prevalent and powerful.

American Politics ResearchVol. 54(3)
John Brown University (US), Lehigh University (US), Brown University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.