The heritability accuracy in forest tree breeding programs relying on random mating

In forest tree breeding, there is a growing trend towards using pedigree reconstruction after offspring are produced through natural random mating (open-pollination), as an alternative to traditional controlled crosses and full-sib genetic trials. Given that most forest tree species are predominantly outcrossing organisms, the accuracy of narrow-sense heritability (h2) under natural mating conditions has not been thoroughly examined, particularly with regard to sample size. Our simulation study focuses on the genetic parameters specific to Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) in Norway. We used the stochastic model MoBPS to simulate a founder population with 100,000 SNP markers distributed across 12 haploid chromosomes, representative of many conifer species. Parental trees were selected from this population, followed by random mating and offspring evaluation. We focused on estimating the accuracy of h2, with particular attention to its precision and bias. Our results suggest that the population sample sizes currently used in forest tree breeding are generally adequate for achieving precision. However, we identified two primary sources of bias: one due to dominance effects and the other from phenotypic parental selection. We discuss potential strategies to mitigate these biases in breeding programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2025.2530427
Primary Topic
Forest ecology and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The heritability accuracy in forest tree breeding programs relying on random mating

Milan Lstibůrek, Torsten Pook, Salvador Alejandro Gezan, Rosario Garcı́a-Gil et al.
Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research
Forest ecology and management
article

The heritability accuracy in forest tree breeding programs relying on random mating

Milan Lstibůrek, Torsten Pook, Salvador Alejandro Gezan, Rosario Garcı́a-Gil, Chedly Kastally, Arne Steffenrem, Tanja Pyhäjärvi, Christi Sagariya
article en

Abstract

In forest tree breeding, there is a growing trend towards using pedigree reconstruction after offspring are produced through natural random mating (open-pollination), as an alternative to traditional controlled crosses and full-sib genetic trials. Given that most forest tree species are predominantly outcrossing organisms, the accuracy of narrow-sense heritability (h2) under natural mating conditions has not been thoroughly examined, particularly with regard to sample size. Our simulation study focuses on the genetic parameters specific to Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) in Norway. We used the stochastic model MoBPS to simulate a founder population with 100,000 SNP markers distributed across 12 haploid chromosomes, representative of many conifer species. Parental trees were selected from this population, followed by random mating and offspring evaluation. We focused on estimating the accuracy of h2, with particular attention to its precision and bias. Our results suggest that the population sample sizes currently used in forest tree breeding are generally adequate for achieving precision. However, we identified two primary sources of bias: one due to dominance effects and the other from phenotypic parental selection. We discuss potential strategies to mitigate these biases in breeding programs.

Scandinavian Journal of Forest ResearchVol. 40(5-6)
University of Helsinki (FI), Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), VSN International (United Kingdom) (GB), Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NO), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning, Technologická Agentura České Republiky, SNS Nordic Forest Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Forest ecology and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.