Increasing adoption of grain postharvest technology by smallholder farmers: a five-pronged strategy
Grain postharvest losses (PHLs) reduce food security, income stability, and climate resilience among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Proven technologies, e.g., hermetic storage bags and metal silos, are available, but significant non-technical barriers to adoption remain. These complex barriers include limited awareness and training, limited local availability, initial high costs, low harvest volumes, underestimation of losses, socio-cultural constraints, and weak institutional and policy support. We propose a five-pronged strategy to increase adoption. In particular: (1) Strengthening farmer knowledge and training systems; (2) Localizing the development and distribution of postharvest technologies; (3) Expanding access to affordable and flexible financing; (4) Reinforcing policy and institutional frameworks; and (5) Embedding postharvest practices within climate-smart, market-driven value chains. Implementation of this strategy positions postharvest management as a structural driver of rural transformation by linking grain loss reduction to increased productivity, enhanced market participation, and livelihood resilience.
Authors
- John F. Leslie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6486-6992)
- Maurice Monjerezi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1136-0653)
- Beston B. Maonga
- Brighton Marimanzi Mvumi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3822-6545)
- Aggrey Pemba Gama (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3158-0605)
- Limbikani Matumba (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9152-2450)
- Bertha Kachala
- Jagger Harvey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1151-3464)
- Tafireyi Chamboko (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5968-369X)
- Andrew Thadzi
- Elija Kamundi
- Theresa Nakoma-Ngoma
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
- Published
- 2025-08-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1640274
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Agricultural Economics and Practices
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.83
Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- United States Agency for International Development
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture