Assessment of the quality of endoscopic tympanoplasty and endoscopic myringoplasty videos on YouTube

YouTube has become a widely used platform for surgical education, especially in otolaryngology. Despite its popularity, the educational quality of available content remains largely unregulated. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty and myringoplasty videos on YouTube using two validated assessment tools: the modified IVORY and the LAP-VEGaS systems. A systematic search was conducted on YouTube in November 2024 using specific keywords. A total of 105 English-language videos demonstrating endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty or myringoplasty were included based on predefined inclusion criteria (view count ≥ 1.000, duration 1–60 min, and accessible engagement metrics). The IVORY scoring system was modified to better fit the procedure and the YouTube platform. Two independent otolaryngologists evaluated all videos using the modified IVORY and standard LAP-VEGaS scoring systems. Inter-rater reliability was assessed with Cohen’s Kappa and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC). Relationships between video characteristics and educational quality were analyzed using Spearman correlation and linear regression. The mean LAP-VEGaS score was 5.9 ± 2.8, with 63.8% of videos rated as low quality (score < 7). The mean IVORY score was 16.4 ± 3.8, and 95.2% of videos received an F grade academically. A strong positive correlation was observed between LAP-VEGaS scores and video likes (r = 0.474, p < 0.001), view rate (r = 0.411, p < 0.001), and views (r = 0.299, p = 0.002), while a negative correlation was found with video upload age (r = − 0.435, p < 0.001). Similarly, IVORY scores were positively correlated with likes (r = 0.349, p < 0.001) and view rate (r = 0.258, p = 0.008), and negatively correlated with upload age (r = − 0.346, p < 0.001). Linear regression showed that the number of likes (β = 0.465, p = 0.002) and upload age (β = − 0.339, p < 0.001) significantly predicted LAP-VEGaS scores. For IVORY scores, upload age was a significant negative predictor (β = − 0.001, p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability was excellent for both scoring systems, with ICC values of 0.896 for LAP-VEGaS and 0.910 for IVORY. Most YouTube videos on endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty and myringoplasty lack high educational quality. Implementing structured guidelines and specialty-specific video evaluation tools is crucial to enhance the educational value of online surgical content. Promoting adherence to instructional design principles may improve the effectiveness of freely available video resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2025-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07775-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the quality of endoscopic tympanoplasty and endoscopic myringoplasty videos on YouTube

Kerimcan Çakıcı, Sabri Köseoğlu
1 citations
BMC Medical Education
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
2.82
article

Assessment of the quality of endoscopic tympanoplasty and endoscopic myringoplasty videos on YouTube

Kerimcan Çakıcı, Sabri Köseoğlu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

YouTube has become a widely used platform for surgical education, especially in otolaryngology. Despite its popularity, the educational quality of available content remains largely unregulated. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty and myringoplasty videos on YouTube using two validated assessment tools: the modified IVORY and the LAP-VEGaS systems. A systematic search was conducted on YouTube in November 2024 using specific keywords. A total of 105 English-language videos demonstrating endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty or myringoplasty were included based on predefined inclusion criteria (view count ≥ 1.000, duration 1–60 min, and accessible engagement metrics). The IVORY scoring system was modified to better fit the procedure and the YouTube platform. Two independent otolaryngologists evaluated all videos using the modified IVORY and standard LAP-VEGaS scoring systems. Inter-rater reliability was assessed with Cohen’s Kappa and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC). Relationships between video characteristics and educational quality were analyzed using Spearman correlation and linear regression. The mean LAP-VEGaS score was 5.9 ± 2.8, with 63.8% of videos rated as low quality (score < 7). The mean IVORY score was 16.4 ± 3.8, and 95.2% of videos received an F grade academically. A strong positive correlation was observed between LAP-VEGaS scores and video likes (r = 0.474, p < 0.001), view rate (r = 0.411, p < 0.001), and views (r = 0.299, p = 0.002), while a negative correlation was found with video upload age (r = − 0.435, p < 0.001). Similarly, IVORY scores were positively correlated with likes (r = 0.349, p < 0.001) and view rate (r = 0.258, p = 0.008), and negatively correlated with upload age (r = − 0.346, p < 0.001). Linear regression showed that the number of likes (β = 0.465, p = 0.002) and upload age (β = − 0.339, p < 0.001) significantly predicted LAP-VEGaS scores. For IVORY scores, upload age was a significant negative predictor (β = − 0.001, p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability was excellent for both scoring systems, with ICC values of 0.896 for LAP-VEGaS and 0.910 for IVORY. Most YouTube videos on endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty and myringoplasty lack high educational quality. Implementing structured guidelines and specialty-specific video evaluation tools is crucial to enhance the educational value of online surgical content. Promoting adherence to instructional design principles may improve the effectiveness of freely available video resources.

BMC Medical EducationVol. 25(1)
Usak University (TR), Gazi Hastanesi (TR), Muğla University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.