Malignity in policy sciences: a theory and framework

Abstract This article introduces and conceptualizes the notion of malignity in policy sciences, examining how public policies can become misaligned with the public interest—whether by design or through the dynamics of the policy process. The special issue underscores the urgent need to reintegrate normative and ethical considerations into policy design, analysis, and implementation. In the context of democratic backsliding, administrative misuse, and technocratic drift, we call for greater attention to the “dark side” of policymaking, where policies are co-opted and distorted to serve marginal or private interests at the expense of democratic values and public interests. The issue advances a theoretical framework that defines malignity as the intentional diversion of state mechanisms away from the public interest. The contributions explore the features and mechanisms of malign policymaking and offer strategies for identifying, mitigating, and responding to its occurrence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy and Society
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puaf016
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Malignity in policy sciences: a theory and framework

M. Jae Moon, Tim Legrand
Policy and Society
Policy Transfer and Learning
article

Malignity in policy sciences: a theory and framework

M. Jae Moon, Tim Legrand
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article introduces and conceptualizes the notion of malignity in policy sciences, examining how public policies can become misaligned with the public interest—whether by design or through the dynamics of the policy process. The special issue underscores the urgent need to reintegrate normative and ethical considerations into policy design, analysis, and implementation. In the context of democratic backsliding, administrative misuse, and technocratic drift, we call for greater attention to the “dark side” of policymaking, where policies are co-opted and distorted to serve marginal or private interests at the expense of democratic values and public interests. The issue advances a theoretical framework that defines malignity as the intentional diversion of state mechanisms away from the public interest. The contributions explore the features and mechanisms of malign policymaking and offer strategies for identifying, mitigating, and responding to its occurrence.

Policy and SocietyVol. 44(2)
Yonsei University (KR), The University of Adelaide (AU)
National Research Foundation, Ministry of Education, National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Policy Transfer and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Malignity in policy sciences: a theory and framework — M. Jae Moon, Tim Legrand · Policy and Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS